Anonymous, 07 Apr 2019Shanti ....
The high price of oled is fault of koreans ...
Samsung and LG uses evaporati... moreRight, but between Samsung and LG, I pick LG because their OLED panels cover a wider range of colors than Samsung's AMOLED panels.
Now we'd have to wait for a proper RGB OLED screen.
Someone's nose will grow a few meters. Too many fake pseudo buyers around here. It's fun to see that a phone that was supposed to be good for photography is now sold as a useful display... It's not worth more than 1/3 of what they ask for.
Even after all these criticisms and bad bias reviews about Nokia 9 pureview, iam still going to buy regardless if its a historic phone or an flip flop phone. Not gonna listen to these haters of what they will soon criticise me!!!!
i don't know why fan of samsung and fan huawei coming here and bashing it. why not accept the fact that the phone is good on it's purpose. me i have this device in order for me to know what is real to what i have only viewing on youtube reviews nor reading article on a page like this. we professional photographers know how to use the camera of this monster. we are not people who opens camera app then point and shoot.
it's awesome that my nokia 9 pureview makes me satisfy on what my eye's can see
Shanti Dope, 07 Apr 2019So by that, it means that high refresh rate OLEDs will only be made when there are enough dema... moreShanti ....
The high price of oled is fault of koreans ...
Samsung and LG uses evaporation method.
It costs more, it is slower and much more material is wasted.
Panasonic uses inkjet printing.
Cheaper, faster and waste of materials is decreased.
Sadly they cant produce enough through JOLED
ZolaIII, 06 Apr 2019It will be cheaper thanks to new players (mostly Chinese); BEOL, TCL and JDI (all do Japanese ... moreJDi just got investmemt from chinese company, not owned by them.
Sony, Toshiba and Hitachi together have 30%.
The rest belongs to another japanese company.
Samsung sells cameras sensors, prices did not go down.
LG and BOE are selling oled but price is still high.
People wrongly thinks that simple oled is better than an expensive LCD. Flagships from Oppo,Vivo, Motorola and OnePlus that use cheaper oled will never give better image quality than a high end LCD phone from Sony or LG.
Some phones with oled are tested here and show delta above 5, even for a LCD this value is bad.
Samsung has LCD TVs, not oled.
Sony considers the LCD Z series their flagship, not the Bravia oled.
chipset: old, Camera: exaggerated useless, Look: ugly. Nokia will never bee the same like before.
Sunlight contrast ratio is staler cause Nokia invented the first brightest OLED even before Samsung knows about it aka clear black OLED.
ZolaIII, 06 Apr 2019While OLED adoption is just getting hot enough with new players jumping in bandwagon things wi... moreSo by that, it means that high refresh rate OLEDs will only be made when there are enough demand and workforce to manufacture them?
I remember an article that I've read from the past, where a Japanese researcher actually found an alternative (and better I suppose) raw material and process in making an OLED panel. The article also compared the newly found substitute to what Samsung's Super AMOLED panels are made of and how are they made.
Don't get me wrong, 60Hz is fine for me already, but after having used an iPad Pro with 120Hz display, going back to normal 60Hz screens feels like a sluggish performance even when it's not.
Even the iPhone XS devices with 120Hz response rate feels very silky and feels much more natural to respond to my screen actions than a regular 60Hz display.
Nokia is the only phone so far that produces images virtually the same as DSLR. Both p30 and iPhone see look like good phone cameras only. That's the same as comparing two wheelbarrows to a Ford truck.
Anonymous, 06 Apr 20192600 is enough to go outside without any issues. Still, this high screen sunlight legibility means users will not even have any single problem seeing something on their displays even when the sun is directly hitting the phone screen.
I have a good vision and I could see my phone under direct sunlight with maximum brightness, but there are people that need better visibility on smartphone screens, and this Nokia 9's display will greatly help them.
Anonymous, 06 Apr 2019Oled is not getting any cheaper. The screen of s10 costs more than s9 that costs more than ... moreIt will be cheaper thanks to new players (mostly Chinese); BEOL, TCL and JDI (all do Japanese it's owned by Chinese).
Anonymous, 06 Apr 2019No, iphones are not 2m.
The 1,5m value is determinated by international rules according to t... morethen the 2m here is wrong?
and this from Apple's official website, stating both iPhone XS and XS Max are IP68 certified for up to 2 meters, not 1.5 meters.
Walter C. Dornez, 06 Apr 2019That's touch sensitivity, the display itself isn't refreshing 120 times in actualityoh sorry I confused both concepts :(
Anonymous, 06 Apr 2019Oled is not getting any cheaper. The screen of s10 costs more than s9 that costs more than ... moreWell, that's probably because they are bigger.... And for s10, punching precise hole actually costs money...
ZolaIII, 06 Apr 2019While OLED adoption is just getting hot enough with new players jumping in bandwagon things wi... moreOled is not getting any cheaper.
The screen of s10 costs more than s9 that costs more than s8 that costs more than s7 edge
Come on, Nokia. What a joke. I miss the good old Lumia 920/930/1020 time.
I own the phone for a four days now. If you expect your photos to be equally good or better as they were in Lumia 1020, forget it. You'll be disappointed.
Buying this phone after Lumia 1020, Mi 6, P20 Pro got me to conclusion that I'd be better for me (as a fan of photography) to buy a mirrorless. Hope this opinion helps the hesitators as I was one of you.