I still don't why the hell everyone ditching HEADPHONE JACK.
I pray that SAMSUNG & LG should not to do this
Khaled6869, 06 Apr 2019120 Hz works with the Super AMOLED panels on the iPhone XS and XS Max, don't forget thatThat's touch sensitivity, the display itself isn't refreshing 120 times in actuality
I knew it. What is the size of those camera sensors?
Great phone can't wait to buy one.
camera of nokia is the best. my lumia 950 can slash mate 20 and p30
Many will get this for the display, not the camera
I mean, it's almost one point ahead of the previous best smartphone screen in outdoor visibility, which means this phone will be the least problematic to be used under direct sunlight, and that will be beneficial to people who constantly use their phones outside.
I love Nokia, but this phone is lacking.
First point, Why is it ok to have to edit each and every image with adobe light room to get acceptable images?? Why do I need a special phone to do that ? You can do that with any phone. I guess if you are a photographer, then you will have to edit each and every image you shoot anyway because you are naturally unhappy about the world that surrounds you .
The 4k video Quality Sucks .
Yes, they hinted it at in the review. But let me just mention that again
The 4k video Quality Sucks
It may have been acceptable 2 years ago, but not today. Why release a supposedly photographers dream phone that lacks quality video. Maybe they should have limited this phone to pictures only with no available video capture mode.
I've lots of different review saying Nokia phones have buggy software. How are hmd managing to mess that up? They're using android one so it should be as big free as possible
Now, if only they will put a 1 inch sensor in a phone, they will only need 1 lens.
Hang on a minute, Panasonic did it already 4 years ago!
Shui8, 06 Apr 2019The camera looks the most overprocessed pictures i've ever seen. Not to my liking at all. T... morei have this with me and your not sure about what you are saying sir. my n9pureview captures rich images/natural images compares to most high end phones way back 2018 until now.
Nick Tagataka, 06 Apr 2019I'm not quite sure why HMD even allowed this phone to carry the PureView brand name. The way i... moreyou don't understand what it's camera for. its for us photographers that uses dslr in manual mode. not just a shoot then post on and photo social apps out there. and im a professional programmer and i prefer and 101% recommend google to code for their camera app because google own's the android os. they can penetrate the code by a unique way without opening the source code for public use.
A shame couldn't live up to expectations.... So it's doomed even before it's launch, . Let's face it HMD is still not there yet to compete with the big boys ....maybe in two or three years if they keep doing thing right
ZolaIII, 06 Apr 20191) Lumias with original pure view sensor ware not so fat while that sensor is still superior t... moreThe old lumias were small like XZ1, but much thicker and with much less battery.
No brand will make a phone near 2cm ( not counting that brick called Energizer with 18000 mAh) and few more milimeters of cam.
The cam module with smaller sensor like 1/3", 1/2.5" and 1/2.3" dont have more than 4 mm thickness. 1/1.2" would be double. Not counting the space it needs horizontally. 1/1.7" has 2x the size of 1/2.5" already.
Google Pixel had so far 1/2.3" then 1/2.55"... Not 1/2.9".
Samsung phones use 8bit 60Hz oled, same story for iphone.
There is no EIS for 4K60. This mode takes so much on the phone that the processing power does not have strength enough to provide the electronic stabilization. That is why few brands with SD845/855 do not offer.
OnePlus and Xiaomi use many cheaper components from local suppliers. Xiaomi makes more than 2 bi dollars/year with Miui adds. It helps with price.
Just the materials bill of s10+ is $430, while whole mi9 ready to be sold ( taxes, profits, distribution, R/D, work force etc) is $490.
Ppl still have the big dream that phones from Xiaomi, Honor and OnePlus cost the same as Samsung, Sony, Apple, Htc, Huawei (P, Mate) or LG to be made.
Crazy how the phone always shot at ISO6400 in low light. Even though it lacks OIS it shouldn't go as high ISO as that.
Plus it got 5 cameras to work with, if anything it should be able to shot at lower ISO.
Hope they consider to go back to large sensor size like the two original Pureviews. Clearly, multiple cameras solution didn't work quite well.They should've learn from Huawei P10 or Xperia XZ2 Premium.
Khaled6869, 06 Apr 2019of course I can be wrong in some things, I can correct the mistakes.
the iPhone Xs and Xs M... moreNo, iphones are not 2m.
The 1,5m value is determinated by international rules according to tests.
IP67 is 1m + 30 min, IP68 is 1,5m + 30 min.
Khaled6869, 06 Apr 2019120 Hz works with the Super AMOLED panels on the iPhone XS and XS Max, don't forget thatIphones do not have have 120Hz like iPad.
It is just the touch.
Dhruv, 06 Apr 2019Dude only lg manufactures oled. Mo one else does. So where ever u see oled it's lgP-oled is just commercial name like Samsung calls their as SuperAmoled.
All oled for mobile have active matrix.
Colors and detail in daylight stills is actually most close to xz2c, which is still the best in capturing hdr detail. Pretty awesome for the killed compact line. May xperia1 get better... Cannot wait, even with nokia9 looking better than the others, it's worse than 1 in colors, just when it's coming...
ZolaIII, 06 Apr 2019Response rate (Hz) is more tied to the matrix than emitting diodes them self. So you have only... moreOkay, so let's settle the fact that 120Hz on OLED panels is possible, but then why aren't they still available today?
I mean, we've had 120Hz and 144Hz IPS monitors for years, heck even 240Hz for quite some years already, but is there anybody who invested their time in creating a good 120Hz OLED panel?
Is 90Hz (Asus ROG Phone) already the best that they could achieve with this type of display technology?
I do get that it's not very easy to develop such a thing, but I imagined that anytime by now, a prototype of it must've been available already, assuming that the development of such thing started some 5 years ago.
If OLEDs, by nature, are better at handling high-speed motions than TFT/IPS LCDs, then shouldn't it mean that manufacturers will invest more on them than the latter?