Boreas, 23 Apr 2019Even the reviews I alluded to are from India. Still, surprising to see an established brand li... moreAgreed, at least in India. Everywhere else though, Xiaomi and Samsung don't have ads. Seems to possibly be part of an agreement in India, since the mobile landscape is getting more popular in India.
Walter C. Dornez, 23 Apr 2019It's possible that it is market specific. In a lot of the reviews that were based in the west,... moreEven the reviews I alluded to are from India. Still, surprising to see an established brand like Samsung resort to these gimmicks.
Few months back I had mentioned Xiaomi's dubious ad policy will 'inspire' other manufacturers.
Realme 3 Pro is a better device than Redmi 7 pro and Samsung A50 as it doesn't invade privacy of owners with pesky ads. This is true for India, I don't know about other markets.
Anonymous, 22 Apr 2019All brands should use only usb C since 2017.
I hate the fact many chinese brands trade NFC... moreIt's normal the transition from micro to type-c take a lot of time because micro are so popular and become de facto standart in the phone industry (exc. apple).
Moreover all/most mid-low phone which have type-c port, still using usb 2.0 speed and also only have basic feature for charging and data transfer.
Anonymous, 22 Apr 2019Preinstalled apps https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.reddit.com/r/Android/comments/b1y5rc/the_g... moreIt's possible that it is market specific. In a lot of the reviews that were based in the west, I haven't seen this
'There's a ton of detail captured and there's no noise to complain about.'
Just one question. Does GSMArena have crews separated for low- and midrange and flagship reviewing? Because this camera is objectively FAR from capturing 'ton of detail'.
You just look at this messy grass, starting.. from nearest point. This is actually gross.
Anonymous, 22 Apr 2019no USB-C is a deal breaker from 2019 on wardsAll brands should use only usb C since 2017.
I hate the fact many chinese brands trade NFC, USB C, Gorilla 4 or 5 for more RAM and better cpu.
I'd rather have SD625 with all this than 636 or 660 without
Battery test should have scored 105h
Walter C. Dornez, 22 Apr 2019Nah, that's most likely third party related.Preinstalled apps
Not only m series but also a series have ads
If you have a samsung phone and you didn't saw ads just open some preinstalled samsung apps and than you will start seing ads
DroidBoye, 22 Apr 2019LOL, yeah, A50 is only equal to it's significantly lower priced "competitors".I said in terms of camera. Performance may seem under par but reviews have shown the phone doesn't skip a beat since it's quite well optimized. In general though, software is better than a large majority of the budget and mid-range, losing out to only fans and stock Android
how long will review for redmi note 7 pro take
Why no review for redmi note 7 pro by Gsmarena.
Boreas, 22 Apr 2019I've read in reviews that Samsung has started using 'ads' like Xiaomi in certain A series phon... moreThere won't be any ads in their system apps, unlike Xiaomi. Ads in the lock sreen are the cause of third party apps, and ads in browsers/games/apps are normal (obviously)
About lock screen ads:
GalaxyUser, 22 Apr 2019Overall if we consider every features Galaxy A50 is most BALANCED mid-range device. If it is n... moreProbably agreed, but I hope that they'd revive their IP ratings next year, especially if they're able to get their sales back up
And for competition's sake, maybe replace SoCs of phones using E7870 with E7884, E7884 with E7904, E7904 with E7885, E7885 with E9610, and for the A50 (2020)'s chipset, their new Exynos 9710. Then yeah, I can see their goal to remain no 1 is highly possible
Buuut... we, as their customers must criticise them for not being on par with others. That's simply how it's done to get the best of the best as a consumer. So please, complain more ;)
It's competitors Redmi Note 7 pro not Redmi note 7 .... In performance segment you compare with Redmi note 7.
It’s 2019. But no type c. Redmi note7pro also has Type c and back panel is Glass with gorilla glass 5.
But realme3pro is not Glass in back panel, No Type C. And no 48mp camera. But price is the same. So i think redmi note 7 is better then Realme 3 pro.
A micro usb!!? Are you dream realme!? It's almost 2020...
Anonymous, 22 Apr 2019The problem with a50 is that it is more expensive yhan redmi note 7 pro and realme 3 pro abd o... moreA50 is only comparable to the Redmi Note 7. Heck if users really wanted a truly objective comparison, they should visit Notebookcheck review of the individual device more often. I like GSMArena but Notebookcheck has better comparisons and tests hardwarewise which GSMArena weren't able to go deeper in terms of their reviews. On the OneUI "optimization" part were quite questionable. I've seen a review which compares the M30 and A30 (basically same phone with minor differences especially in their OS) and M30 was found to be faster than the A30. OneUI optimizations (speed-wise) is negligible (objectively) at these pricepoints while the UI-design experience would only be subjective comparison.