What's the best phone? My choice is Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus.. My choice is much more technical than personal.. What's important to me may not be important to you. You decide which is the best ! Samsung Galaxy S10 Plus Advantages
PDAF: phase detection autofocus on both cameras
(dual front camera) 10MP + 8MP
4K UHD (3840x2160 pixels)
(4G+ LTE-A) 2000 Mbps
=========== OnePlus 7 Pro Advantages ===========
2.8Ghz 64bit Octa-Core
(triple camera) 48MP + 8MP + 16MP
1/2" inches (SENSOR SIZE)
Dickson, 23 Jul 2019Specs of one plus 7 pro match with the specs of k20 pro and the camera of redmi k20 pro is muc... moreQuality. Specs don't tell the whole story. Watch MKBHD's video on Redmi K20 pro.
Dickson, 23 Jul 2019Specs of one plus 7 pro match with the specs of k20 pro and the camera of redmi k20 pro is muc... moreOnePlus having better 2k 90hz super smooth screen,warp charge and the biggest thing that matters is software support upto 3,4 years. My op 3t of 2016 still getting os and security updates
Anonymous, 22 Jul 2019Dude, not everyone can see why people prefer OnePlus 7pro than the s10plus. ItÂ’s okay if you ... moreAbsurd like "pixel phone is one of the more popular option" tells a lot about a speaker. Google's market share as a mobile vendor is 2.31% in US. And more like a rounding error worldwide. It's a mystery who's the target audience for this overpriced piece of hardware junk (even with excellent camera software).
Specs of one plus 7 pro match with the specs of k20 pro and the camera of redmi k20 pro is much better. However there is a hugh price difference op7 pro for INR 53000 and k20 pro for INR 32000... WHY???
abc.to.xyz, 07 Jul 2019OP7Pro is a tier-2 phone. Can't understand why would anyone spend 800$ but not 1000$ to get a ... moreDude, not everyone can see why people prefer OnePlus 7pro than the s10plus. ItÂ’s okay if you donÂ’t see it or donÂ’t understand why. ItÂ’s not all about specs, specs makes no much difference now a days considering how powerful and advance smartphones hardware can offer. Hardware are way too ahead than software, this is why people should choose smartphones base on software. The best example is pixel phone, it donÂ’t offer the most powerful hardware but yet itÂ’s one of the more popular option
Audiofag, 17 Jul 2019Aptxhd makes a huge difference to aptx and has been my deal-breaker for at least the last two ... moreSamsung will never match audio quality of LG's Quad DAC and HTC's Boomsound!
These two audio giants have dedicated DAC alongside quallcom's own DAC (which is pretty lame).
jon snow, 05 Jul 2019Now let me also read your list of s10+ better features.
I'm still laughing about samsung pay.You're just being bias and hurt.
Objectively the s10 is simply factually ahead in almost every where. And that's where it's measurable objectively.
nate0, 11 Jul 2019I would like to see bluetooth streaming quality tests for Hi-Res files/aptx/aptx HD. Can that... moreAptxhd makes a huge difference to aptx and has been my deal-breaker for at least the last two years, if you want good Bluetooth audio the Samsung phones aren't something I would even consider.
If Samsung does choose to implement aptxhd then that will be my next phone
I would like to see bluetooth streaming quality tests for Hi-Res files/aptx/aptx HD. Can that be done ever please?
amy.22, 08 Jul 2019slow season?. I'm still waiting for the next honor note . hopefully something like the nova 5 ... morebut why huawei over samsung or sony?
its almost the same price!
snapdragon and exynos are way better than kirin, especially in AI and security part.
abc.to.xyz, 07 Jul 2019OP7Pro is a tier-2 phone. Can't understand why would anyone spend 800$ but not 1000$ to get a ... moreagree here!
1+ went in wrong direction, they think they can compete with best players.... they became too greedy too early :)
i am not a samsung fan nor apple fan, i just see things as they are.
slow season?. I'm still waiting for the next honor note . hopefully something like the nova 5 pro but 6.9 inches.
nevertheless, the galaxy 10 is the winner and the best smartphone anyway. the best value and all-rounder. There's no contest.
OP7Pro is a tier-2 phone. Can't understand why would anyone spend 800$ but not 1000$ to get a premium device. OP was fine in 300-500$ territory, not 600-800$ one.
Update for 7pro.
Optimized the touchscreen sensitivity of the display;
Optimized manual brightness adjustment during video playback;
Update of Android security patches in June 2019;
Bug fixes and general improvements;
Improved audio quality;
Improvement of the general contrast and color performance;
Improved triple-camera white balance;
Better accuracy and stability of audio focus;
Improved contrast and color saturation of the wide-angle camera;
Enhance sharpness and reduce noise in low light conditions for the wide-angle camera;
Improve sharpness and noise reduction for telephoto;
Improve sharpness and color in Nightscape mode;
Improve brightness and sharpness in low light in Nightscape mode;
Solved the problem of greenish tone in case of poor lighting;
Fixed the noise problem with HDR;
Anonymous, 06 Jul 2019Far superior charging speeds on the Oneplus. Better resale value on the Samsung. I found that resale value is better in oneplus
How is possible that one plus has higher pixel density.
Very nice review :)
Far superior charging speeds on the Oneplus. Better resale value on the Samsung.
Anonymous, 05 Jul 2019Brand prestige? When did samsung become prestigious they sell 80$ devices. They are floodong t... moreBrand recognition and prestige in mobile phones is something that is built over the years through cutting edge and pioneering technologies in flagship products as well as through long term reputation of reliable and consistent good quality and perceived premium value, as evidenced by a premium price ABOVE most of the competition, despite which, a huge customer base will still happily pay for. It has nothing to do with selling low end products of the same brand. Just because you can buy an entry level Samsung phone for a very low price doesn't mean the brand name 'Samsung' does not have any prestige. Try selling a Oneplus 7 Pro at the price of the S10+ and see how the sales of Oneplus crumble. That's called Samsung's branding image and prestige. You can't build that image overnight even if you are as powerful and as big a company as Google. That's why Google's expensive Pixel phones keep on getting dumped. The Pixel phones have to earn that brand image and prestige by starting at an appealing price. Starting at a very high price despite being relatively new to the market is not the way to do it. Google should do it the way Huawei is doing it, and which Xiaomi, Oppo and Vivo are following. Start very cheap with excellent specs and super value for the money, and once you get the customer's attention and loyalty and gain a following, slowly build the image of prestige through pioneering, cutting edge technologies while also slowly increasing the phone price with careful assessment of how the market reacts. If the market share decreases, then there is a need to re-asses if the price increase was too aggressive or if there was enough advertising or pioneering or cutting edge technology that makes the customer willing to pay for the higher price. Doing a shortcut like what Oneplus is doing, (raising prices too fast, too soon without assessment of the market reaction and without offering pioneering technology) always ends up in disaster. That's why Google is outing a cheaper Pixel 3a. But still, the price is too high for a relative phone brand 'newcomer' and doesn't stand a chance with the competition from Xiaomi, Oppo and Vivo. Google and Oneplus should have been done it the way Huawei built a name for itself through the years. Gradual price increases and pioneering technologies while assessing market share and what the competition offers. Xiaomi, Oppo and Vivo are copying Huawei's strategy. Huawei would have overtaken Samsung in the prestige ladder in a few more years if not for the Trump ban. Samsung needs to come up with something new to stay on top. Same with Apple which is in dire waters. The iPhone 11 better have something pioneering in the camera department or it will be a continuing market slide/decline that will become more and more difficult to control with each unimpressive release.