Huawei P40 Pro review Comments
- Canko
- SdG
Shui8, 02 Apr 2020My logic DxO are legit in some situation. And they usually got newer firmware (beta) for camer... moreI confirm Dxo is not measure!
- AHA
- SdG
I am sure the photos are if not the best one of the best...but if you want a high end Soc you will bye Qualcomm, not a Kirin one!?!?! Lack of Google services is minus of course . Display is not high end too, Samsung a still top producer...And of course the big notch, man we are 2020!!! For 1000 euro area i consider Oppo X2, mi 10 Pro, One plus 8 or S 20 Ultra, although the last is without Qualcomm Soc for EU market !!!!
- Nick Tagataka
- gR5
Anonymous, 03 Apr 2020I watched Huawei's presentation and it seems that their "Octa" autofocus is actually just dual... moreIf that's the case then what was the point of showing 4 pixels at the same time? Doesn't it imply it uses omnidirectional AF along with dual pixel AF as well?
- Nick Tagataka
- gR5
AnonD-754814, 02 Apr 2020DxOMARK is a joke. Just like you said , using logic. in DxOmark video review. The p40 pro g... moreSo that you won't necessarily have to sacrifice the image quality to get the wider field of view than the main camera? I myself prefer wider lens (I find 15-17mm to be a sweet spot that has the best balance between wideness, per pixel quality and distortion) for UWA camera, but I can definitely see the appeal of having a bit narrower one with a giant sensor.
- Anonymous
- gBV
Shui8, 02 Apr 2020How can you be so sure? You have the phone in your hand? Even in this review, it mention cl... moreI watched Huawei's presentation and it seems that their "Octa" autofocus is actually just dual pixel autofocus for Quad Bayer sensors (not to be confused with the quad pixel autofocus from Oppo's smartphone).
- Anonymous
- 0%R
Damn, that's ugly.
- Shui8
- KZK
ypcx, 02 Apr 2020As for the ultrawide, this is the practical difference between S10+ and P30 Pro (P40 Pro is ev... moreThis are my samples using vanilla Mate 20 at 17mm (1mm different from latest Huawei). - https://drive.google.com/folderview?id=1Ck1bM61xJVNUufvJMGpt-Hf9M2YNUWwp
For sure I'm really satisfied with it. Its true a little bit wider can be interesting but also will be harder to compose, as there are too many things in 1 frame.
- Shui8
- KZK
AnonD-754814, 02 Apr 2020Dual Pixel AF is still faster and more accurate.
If they are faster and more accurate then h... moreHow can you be so sure? You have the phone in your hand?
Even in this review, it mention clearly in camera section, Octa PDAF should be better than traditional Dual Pixel. - https://m.gsmarena.com/huawei_p40_pro-review-2089p5.php
- ypcx
- 0V7
As for the ultrawide, this is the practical difference between S10+ and P30 Pro (P40 Pro is even narrower).
https://i.ibb.co/pJhFzWM/P30-Pro.jpg
https://i.ibb.co/FhfJXpq/S10-Plus.jpg
- Shui8
- KZK
AnonD-754814, 02 Apr 2020Dual Pixel AF is still faster and more accurate.
If they are faster and more accurate then h... moreHow can you know? You have the phone for comparison?.From all samples i've saw across the net, the Octa PDAF is indeed impressive.
'This camera has improved autofocus - now it's an all pixel omnidirectional phase detection autofocus. This means that not only are there autofocus detectors on each pixel but they are 8 of them per pixel. As a result, the camera's autofocus sensing has improved response to horizontal details whereas conventional dual pixel autofocus systems have a hard time with those. This also means autofocusing should also be generally improved in low-light.'
This are straight statement from GSMarena themselves. In theory, it should be better than Dual Pixel.
- AnonD-754814
- uNV
Shui8, 02 Apr 2020My logic DxO are legit in some situation. And they usually got newer firmware (beta) for camer... moreDual Pixel AF is still faster and more accurate.
If they are faster and more accurate then how can P40 pro gets better AF than them ?
- Shui8
- KZK
ypcx, 02 Apr 2020You should stop shilling. It's customers like you that encourages companies produce inferior p... moreWow will my statement encourage & affects big company? They better pay me some royalty lol.
I'm not just simply disagree with him, i just agree with basic knowledge on actual camera photography world. Like i said, its up to him, but doesnt change the rules of focal length philosophy.
- Shui8
- KZK
AnonD-754814, 02 Apr 2020DxOMARK is a joke.
Just like you said , using logic.
in DxOmark video review. The p40 pro g... moreMy logic DxO are legit in some situation. And they usually got newer firmware (beta) for camera quality before retail version got it.
About video quality, maybe I dont agree with the score as well (those jitters still emerge), but its Octa PDAF? Its as good as X2 Pro. Its one of the recipe for its excellent lowlight performer. (Dual Pixel in Samsung & Iphone were great as well).
- ypcx
- 0V7
Shui8, 02 Apr 2020Its up to you if you wont consider it. Doesnt change the fact that its indeed actually an UltraWide.You should stop shilling. It's customers like you that encourages companies produce inferior products.
No, in the smartphone world, this is not "Ultrawide" by any means, forget it.
And he knows the choice is up to him, what kind of argument i that, are you 6 years old?
- AnonD-754814
- uNV
ypcx, 02 Apr 2020Yep, they pretty much killed the phone by removing the ultrawide from it. What they now call ... moreI was tired of making that point to them.
- ypcx
- 0V7
AnonD-754814, 02 Apr 2020What I'm trying to say is the field is too narrow compared to the competitors. That's not acce... moreYep, they pretty much killed the phone by removing the ultrawide from it.
What they now call ultrawide is just a little bit wider than galaxy's main cam.
I was already suffering going from S10+ to P30 Pro, lacking the power of Samsung's real ultrawide.
Again, what's the point of narrow "ultrawide"? Who cares that it's sharper, if it's unusable in interiors and weak in landscapes?
- AnonD-754814
- uNV
Shui8, 02 Apr 2020For me, theres only one simple answer.
To eliminate corner softness completely, and to get ... moreDxOMARK is a joke.
Just like you said , using logic.
in DxOmark video review. The p40 pro got 98( 100 in still) for AF where the AF is worse than iPhone and some other.
- Shui8
- KZK
AnonD-754814, 02 Apr 2020Yeah. For the crop factor, the main sensor isn't an Ultrawide. I wonder why they choose to crop. For me, theres only one simple answer.
To eliminate corner softness completely, and to get a perfect free-distortion. The downside are overall sharpness will be sacrificed (fuzzy) and its evident on GSMarena studio setup, Mate 30 Pro still got the best in terms of details.
However samples on DxO looks better. Maybe different firmware used.
- AnonD-754814
- uNV
Shui8, 02 Apr 2020I mention 'CROP' along with pixel-binning a dozen time in my replies. Anyway, at least it c... moreYeah. For the crop factor, the main sensor isn't an Ultrawide. I wonder why they choose to crop.
- Shui8
- KZK
AnonD-754814, 02 Apr 2020You should recheck your comment where you said the pixel binning is responsible for the 23mm t... moreI mention 'CROP' along with pixel-binning a dozen time in my replies.
Anyway, at least it clears some of your confusion understanding.
Tip us
1.7m 126k
RSS
EV
Merch
Log in I forgot my password Sign up