As usual pixel proving they are the worst choice for people outside US.
Terrible battery life despite having 60hz display.
Anybody with a brain will happily buy last year's flagship at that price range and be super satisfies with their purchase.
Asvaberg, 15 Aug 2020"Plenty of storage"? 128GB and no expandable/slot?Don't forget that Pixel phones have smart storage. When your phone gets full, it will delete the oldest photos and videos that are uploaded to Google Photos.
I have a Pixel 3 64GB and have no storage problems, even after almost 2 years of use.
Samsung S10e is a similar compact phone, that can be had new for 100 pounds/euros/dollars more but has faster chipset, wireless forward/reverse charge, micro sd expansion, ultrawide camera and IP68 certification.
For the price bump, this is much better value for all the extra features.
Gsma tend to forget about older phones that are still relevant like this one.
And do not forget to explained about the external bottoms , are they on the Rh side on the upper corner ? Please telle about that.
Useless phone. Wrong battery. Next one!!!
So so stupid!!!
Just build a metal phone with normal processor amoled screen en ultrafast charging. That's it. Seems difficult.
Will the review be updated with loudspeaker test? And isn't Astrophotography already available on almost all Huawei/Honor phones as startrail mode? Or is it different?
Alex 94, 15 Aug 2020This phone should cost 250€ max, not 350. Even redmi note 9 pro which is 220€ is better deal t... moreOhhh, sorry but your phone's camera is garbage compared to this one, and does it has software and security update for 3 years, I bet not. Hmmm, Xiaomi fanboyism at its peak everyone!!!
This phone should cost 250€ max, not 350. Even redmi note 9 pro which is 220€ is better deal than this in every segment except screen.
this phone got less score than a similarly specced yet pricier a71. Nice.
You shouldn't have skipped on the loudspeaker test, no matter the excuses. I hope you will update the review in due course.
Feels like a biased review. This has the best camera of any Android phones at the price, 3 years of software updates, more than any other Android phone at this price. Stock Android itself is also really good. 5G is still not an important feature as they are not well established enough yet.
I think the rating should be higher, at least 4 stars. Furthermore, "not much of an upgrade over the Pixel 3a" should not be a con since not everyone uses a Pixel 3a.
For anyone who have not used a Pixel, this is a great phone owing to its price, compact size, camera, stock Android and 3 years of support. It's a phone for everyone.
lcd 82, 15 Aug 2020For me next month they will become reality, gorgeous phoneCongratulations for your new phone in advance bro ! 😃
J9858, 15 Aug 2020How are you not praising the Camera more?? It's litterally the best Camera experience on ... moreTo say that this phone has the best camera in under $500 is just an opinion. Why? because most modern smartphones already take good photos and it just a matter of preference as to which one you like more. I used to believe that Pixel phones have the best camera in all smartphones only to get a little disappointed when I tried GCam ports. Yes, the Night Sight is among the best. The "focus tracking" feature is unrivaled. The portrait mode is lovely. But that "cooler" look in daytime shots are not appealing to me. I prefer the output of Samsung or Sony which is more on the warmer and saturated side. This is just my preference though and I understand other people may have different preferences. That is why we cannot say that "this camera phone is better than this" because good photos can be subjective and just a matter of preference.
Jontness, 15 Aug 2020My dreamphoneFor me next month they will become reality, gorgeous phone
Well, actually quite surprised, this gets a 3,7 and the Nord gets 3,8 overall score.
Hmm doesn't seem like much of an upgrade over the Pixel 2. Shouldn't have sold mine :(