GSMArena.com GSMArena.com

Tip us

1.5m
109k
RSS

EV

Merch

Log in

Login

I forgot my password
Sign up
  • Home
  • News
  • Reviews
  • Videos
  • Featured
  • Phone Finder
  • Deals
  • MerchNew
  • Coverage
  • Contact
ADVERTISEMENTS
GSMArena Team, 27 November 2020

Camera test: The top flagships of the year Comments

  • Read
  • Comments (371)
  • Mate 40 Pro
  • iPhone 12 Pro Max

  • Post your comment
Pages: «12 3 45…1819 »
Sort by:

?
  • Anonymous
  • ntJ
  • 04 Dec 2020

AnonD-923722, 03 Dec 2020Daylight - all phones Super challenging scenario - Mate 40 Pro Lowlight (Auto) - Mate 40 Pr... moreNote 20 ultra at no.2?? Lol and MI 10 ultra at no.4?? Below iPhone 12 pro Max... ROFL.

The camera of the Mi 10 Ultra has changed my perception of Mi images. The excellent high quality (which is better than any Samsung mobile phones in 2020) makes me look forward to the performance of Mi 11.------Ice Universe.

  • Rating1 |
  • Reply
  • Report
?
  • Anonymous
  • ntJ
  • 04 Dec 2020

Anonymous, 02 Dec 2020Sources? examples? links? Can you provide any of those or is silly innuendo all you got?? ... moreLol why you need source?
The A13 scored around 1400-1500 in Single core yet comfortably lost to almost every Snapdragon 865 phone in real world speed tests.
Snapdragon 865 single core was around 900.

  • Rating2 |
  • Reply
  • Report
13091095
  • Android Authority
  • Mxm
  • 03 Dec 2020

Anonymous, 02 Dec 2020Sources? examples? links? Can you provide any of those or is silly innuendo all you got?? ... moreEven if sources and links are presented, you guys refuse to acknowledge them.
BTW, ask yourself.... Why would anyone bother entertaining anonymous tr^lls like you with sources and furnish data and other links? (easily obtainable by a few minutes of searching)

  • Rating3 |
  • Reply
  • Report
s8924
  • someone123
  • 3%b
  • 03 Dec 2020

Just my 2c, but the iphone seemed to be doing the best all-around, with no major mistakes. It's a camera that I would use any day without worry. The xperia seems to be the worst one, even though it was the one I was hoping would turn everything around :(
The Mate 40 Pro seems, in my eyes, tied to the iphone, but we rarely pixel-peep these days, especially when sharing or using services such as google photos (RIP),

Whenever somebody with an iphone and me, with a galaxy, did a late-evening shootout, the iphone always won. It just has a higher rate of successful photos, something reviews rarely catch.
I now own a Pixel which has an even better success rate, though it fails all reviews. I'd really wish they'd get their game up-to-date and deliver some new technology that's not from 3 years ago.

My TLDR is, don't trust the reviews so much, although they are very useful. Go and use the phone for a night and a day, you might be surprised.

  • Rating1 |
  • Reply
  • Report
A
  • Austin
  • Nue
  • 03 Dec 2020

TBH am loving the Galaxy Note 20 Ultra .

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
F10
  • FourX
  • FIn
  • 03 Dec 2020

bulbulito.bayagbag, 02 Dec 2020Huawei Mate 40 and the iPhone 12 Pro Max are leading the pack. Samsung and Sony has a lot of c... moreYou wish

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
D
  • AnonD-923722
  • wrX
  • 03 Dec 2020

Daylight - all phones
Super challenging scenario - Mate 40 Pro
Lowlight (Auto) - Mate 40 Pro
Extreme Lowlight - Mate 40 Pro
Night mode - Samsung Note 20 Ultra
Detail - Mate 40 Pro/Note 20 Ultra
Detail in lowlight - Mate 40 Pro
Detail in Night mode - Iphone 12 Pro Max
Dynamic Range - Huawei Mate 40 Pro
Extreme Dynamic Range - Huawei Mate 40 Pro
Colours - Iphone and Samsung
Pro mode - Sony Xperia 1 and Mate 40 Pro
RAW - IPhone 12 Pro Max / Mate 40 Pro

Ultrawide Daytime - Note 20 Ultra
Ultrawide Nighttime (Auto) - Note 20 Ultra and Mate 40 Pro
Ultrawide Night mode - Note 20 Ultra
Ultrawide Highest quality - Mate 40 Pro

Zoom Daylight - Mate 40 Pro
Zoom Night - Mate 40 Pro and Note 20 Ultra

Portrait mode - Mate 40 Pro in aperture mode
HDR Portrait - Iphone 12 Pro Max and Mate 40 Pro
Lowlight Portrait - Iphone 12 Pro and Mate 40 Pro

Video Daylight - Note 20 Ultra and Iphone 12 Pro Max
Video HDR - Iphone 12 Pro Max
Video challenging scenario - Iphone 12 Pro Max
Video stabilization - Note 20 Ultra (has super steady)
Video Lowlight - Iphone 12 Pro Max/Note 20 Ultra
Video Extreme Lowlight - Mate 40 Pro with ultrawide
Video Extreme HDR - Iphone
Video Ultrawide - Note 20 Ultra/ Iphone 12 Pro Max
Video zoom lens - Mate 40 Pro
Time Lapse - Mate 40 pro /Iphone
Slow Motion - Mate 40 Pro / Iphone 12 Pro Max
Pro video : Mate 40 Pro ( can use all lens)
Note 20 Ultra ( features)

Daylight Selfie - Mate 40 Pro/ Iphone 12 Pro Max
Ultrawide Selfie - Mate 40 Pro
HDR selfie - Mate 40 Pro
Extreme Dynamic Range - Mate 40 Pro
Colours - Iphone 12 Pro Max
Detail Daylight - Iphone 12 Pro Max
Detail Lowlight - Iphone 12 Pro Max
Lowlight - None of them
Night mode - Iphone 12 Pro Max
Selfie video - Iphone 12 Pro Max /Mate 40 Pro
Selfie Lowlight video - Iphone (but none of them to be real)

Overall, if i am travelling and i need a camera that i can rely on, i will pick :
1. Mate 40 Pro
2. Note 20 Ultra
3. IPhone 12 Pro Max
4. Maybe the Mi 10 Ultra

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
b66364
  • bulbulito.bayagbag
  • 7X1
  • 02 Dec 2020

Huawei Mate 40 and the iPhone 12 Pro Max are leading the pack. Samsung and Sony has a lot of catching up to do.

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
M30977
  • Maame Raggae
  • CGH
  • 02 Dec 2020

Are there any original comments left here? Seems everyone is responding to someone

  • Rating1 |
  • Reply
  • Report
J1806403
  • JDK
  • ybx
  • 02 Dec 2020

Anonymous, 02 Dec 2020Sources? examples? links? Can you provide any of those or is silly innuendo all you got?? ... moreThank you!

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
?
  • Anonymous
  • TkN
  • 02 Dec 2020

Anonymous, 02 Dec 2020Their A14 GeekBench scam is exposed. The chip throttles badly and is losing in speed tests as... moreSources? examples? links?
Can you provide any of those or is silly innuendo all you got??

I ask as I put 'A14 geekbench scam' into a search, and the first two hits returned are to GSMarena comments sections, yes more people like you waffling on with anecdotal claptrap!

Could find anything to back up your 'exposed' claim.

  • Rating1 |
  • Reply
  • Report
?
  • Anonymous
  • ntJ
  • 02 Dec 2020

MrHong, 01 Dec 2020This is the issue. Even if someone with high credibility praises an iPhone's certain feat... moreTheir A14 GeekBench scam is exposed.
The chip throttles badly and is losing in speed tests as well.
Real world speed tests not Simulated benchmarks like GaryGimmick that you are plastering everywhere.
Not to forget the total battery hog that is 5g. So much for the 5g marketing.

  • Rating4 |
  • Reply
  • Report
?
  • Anonymous
  • gq3
  • 02 Dec 2020

JDK, 02 Dec 2020And you totally ignored my argument about the verge bashing the magsafe duo charger(calling it... moreLol you are proving what is on everybody's mind.
Junior Doesn't Know...

  • Rating1 |
  • Reply
  • Report
?
  • Anonymous
  • gqv
  • 02 Dec 2020

Anonymous, 02 Dec 2020He’s fixated on this high refresh thing isn’t he? I seen numerous posts from him and other... moreWe don't count people who buy blindly who just see the logo and buy.
Most of these users have no clue which model they have even after years.

  • Rating3 |
  • Reply
  • Report
?
  • Anonymous
  • TkN
  • 02 Dec 2020

JDK, 02 Dec 2020And you totally ignored my argument about the verge bashing the magsafe duo charger(calling it... moreHe’s fixated on this high refresh thing isn’t he?

I seen numerous posts from him and others claiming iOS iPhone users to be jealous of this single feature.

What he fails to comprehend (or is incapable of) is that if this were true, then the moment it became clear the 12 series lacked this feature, you would have seem a massive drop in iPhone sales as users rushed out to make the swap to the droids that have it.

This however has not happened, proving again that whilst iPhone users might desire this single one feature, they are not desperate for it, and quite content to wait.

And seeing as how most iPhone users can easily afford an android should they suddenly want one, this ‘jealousy’ nonsense really comes across as childish.

  • Rating2 |
  • Reply
  • Report
J1806403
  • JDK
  • ybx
  • 02 Dec 2020

[deleted post]Better than your spam of antutu.

A benchmark that doesn't even do cross platform comparison.

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
J1806403
  • JDK
  • ybx
  • 02 Dec 2020

iOS.Never.Again, 01 Dec 2020Awwww they wished it had it... That's not criticism in any way, shape or form. 120hz is... moreAnd you totally ignored my argument about the verge bashing the magsafe duo charger(calling it overpriced) and the homepod mini.

And wishing the iPhones had it is a kind of criticism, criticism saying that iPhones should have got 120hz. Suddenly actual "acceptable" criticism is absolute iPhone bashing.

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
27412065
  • iOS.Never.Again
  • 7kd
  • 01 Dec 2020

JDK, 01 Dec 2020Hmmmm they all say good stuff about apple products, eh? everythingapplepro PRAISED the 120h... moreAwwww they wished it had it... That's not criticism in any way, shape or form.
120hz is a standard feature on Flagships in 2020.
It's even available on mid rangers and budget phones.
No excuse for Apple sticking to 60hz.

If they would have said, "60hz is simply unacceptable in 2020 for a flagship that calls itself premium", I would have called it criticism.
You are proving my point, they are simply sweeping the shortcomings of iPhones under the carpet which is exactly what biased sites do.

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
?
  • Anonymous
  • TkN
  • 01 Dec 2020

MrHong, 01 Dec 2020This is the issue. Even if someone with high credibility praises an iPhone's certain feat... moreI watched that Gary explains video, it was good stuff from a guy who knows what he’s talking about. Yes he found battery drain to be the bigger issue as opposed to thermal throttling.

And your right, who posters on these forums consider as credible lines very much up with the level of agreement to their pre existing biases.

Never read Techtablets so it sure about them, but will check them out. I personally have found people like EverythingApplePro, TailosiveTech Zollotech, even Rene Ritchie all quite willing to criticise Apple where they feel it warranted, even though they are quite obviously Apple fans.


  • Rating1 |
  • Reply
  • Report
M
  • MrHong
  • xZI
  • 01 Dec 2020

Anonymous, 01 Dec 2020You haven’t presented any. All you have is supposition, innuendo and a highly anti-apple bias.... moreThis is the issue. Even if someone with high credibility praises an iPhone's certain features, clowns mark it as a biased review/opinion.

I got bashed when saying Gary Explains mentioned that iPhone 12's A14 turned out it only thermal throttled slightly and not too much like TechTablets said. It is TechTablets who is slowly getting biased because he boos the iPhones but praises Xiaomi too much (he gets Xiaomi phones for free).

  • Rating1 |
  • Reply
  • Report
  • Post your comment
Pages: «12 3 45…1819 »
Sort by:

ADVERTISEMENTS

Phone finder

  • Samsung
  • Apple
  • Huawei
  • Nokia
  • Sony
  • LG
  • HTC
  • Motorola
  • Lenovo
  • Xiaomi
  • Google
  • Honor
  • Oppo
  • Realme
  • OnePlus
  • vivo
  • Meizu
  • BlackBerry
  • Asus
  • Alcatel
  • ZTE
  • Microsoft
  • Vodafone
  • Energizer
  • Cat
  • Sharp
  • Micromax
  • Infinix
  • TCL
  • Ulefone
  • Tecno
  • BLU
  • Blackview
  • Acer
  • Panasonic
  • Plum

All brands Rumor mill

ADVERTISEMENTS

Popular reviews

Apple iOS 14 review

Apple iOS 14 review
Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra review

Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra review
Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G review

Samsung Galaxy Note20 Ultra 5G review

Ebay offers

Related articles

  • Apple shares WWDC 2022 schedule, keynote is on June 6 at the usual hour
  • Apple iPhone 14 development delayed by weeks due to lockdowns in China
  • Apple announces two new Apple Watch Pride Edition bands with matching watch faces
  • Apple to launch new Apple Watch Pride Edition soon

DAILY DEALS

These are the best offers from our affiliate partners. We may get a commission from qualifying sales.
Xiaomi 11T Pro
256GB 12GB RAM $ 542.00
$ 510.00
Xiaomi 11T Pro
256GB 12GB RAM $ 542.00
$ 510.00
Xiaomi 11T Pro
256GB 12GB RAM $ 542.00
$ 510.00
Show all deals
ADVERTISEMENTS

Home News Reviews Compare Coverage Glossary FAQ RSS feed Youtube Facebook Twitter Instagram

© 2000-2022 GSMArena.com Mobile version Android app Tools Contact us Merch store Privacy Terms of use Change Ad Consent Do not sell my data