Winner by design, and WORTHY one. Excellent audio quality and wifi support, decent 3.2 mp camera, vga video recording, is just GREAT offer for its price tag.
Thanks Nokia for being reasonable with pricing for a worthy phone, probably the only company that cares..I really agree to David..
Actually Nokia is far far left behind.
Nokia can only out budget phone only.
bad review not satisfactory as previous review. is the reviewer is changed.
5800 XM sells here for Rs. 16K. with no 3G and GPS and blah blah blah that dont here, this fone mite just come around 12k-13k!
Voila! thats superb!
bad and negative review, though i like the mclaren analogy made at last.
wat happened to Gsmarena...y this stupid review..
u sucking all the parts of samsung star...
just consider this price tag.. then review it..
Its a great mobile for this price..
this phone will be the most sold touch screen device due to it's price.
Congratulation nokia on making such an AFFORDABLE phone.
Handphone sejuta umat
Bad review, i think gsmarena doesn't like nokia at all. well guys i have to buy new phone but i bit confused. shall i wait for 5530,5730 or go for 5800. could u suggest guys. Thanx
this is really bad review of a good phone.
I think this guy is new to the review
Nokia makes phones that give people value for their money. This one is 270 € unlocked where i live. That's almost 3 times cheaper then the iPhone. Obviously if Nokia made 800 € phone and just put in a 3 mp camera, no stereo bluetooth etc, they could make a very nice phone, but thats not Nokias market, screwing people over is left to other companies.
Nokia always have humane prices for what u are getting, like this phone is not worth over 300 €, so it don't cost over 300 €. Iphone 3g S is probably worth 350 € unlocked, but it sells for 800 €.
Thanks Nokia for being reasonable with pricing, probably the only company that cares.
jay, 20 Aug 2009read the review it also have dual flash. small LED flash though.That has to be wrong because all other sites who have reviewed it say there is no dual flash
Reading the review, is too bad about that cheapo wobbly plastic cover. I hope only one bad unit not all like that.
eshaan, 20 Aug 20095800 has carl zeiss and dual flash which 5530 does not have. But picture quality is similar.read the review it also have dual flash. small LED flash though.
Anonymous, 20 Aug 20095530 has the same camera module as 5800?5800 has carl zeiss and dual flash which 5530 does not have.
But picture quality is similar.
Waz, 20 Aug 2009More rubbish from Nokia. It's simply a cut down version of the 5800, which is rubbish too, ... moreit's not a rubbish phone.. it's actually a budget touchscreen phone.. your saying that because you don't like the phone.. perhaps.. you have a higher unit that's why your not satisfied with it's specsheet.
More rubbish from Nokia.
It's simply a cut down version of the 5800, which is rubbish too, exactly the same CPU & Clock speed, so it WILL be rubbish.
Save your money, you CAN get a far better phone than this for your hard earned cash.
i think GSMarena is missing the purpose of this with the main disadvantages cuz at the price point its selling its well balanced compared to other touch screen phones :
No 3G support
No built-in GPS receiver
Average camera image quality
Video recording quality is unimpressive
No DivX/XviD video support out of the box
No TV-out functionality
they might as well bitch about the lack of a transmitter .. i am not sure if they changed the guy/girl who review the phones but this review and the one for the 5730 XM are not as good as usual !!!!!