Sony Ericsson Elm preview: First look - comments

r

robertson
pkp
30 Dec 2009

cowon s9 rip off in terms of design (the s9 looks much better), small screen, no OS, crap of a camera

Reply

G

Go
tVk
30 Dec 2009

screen size depend on individual as not all people require big screen on their phone and with big screen you'll have to increase the phone size and weight. This phone is perfect for everyday use and the splash resistant feature is a welcomed feature.

Reply

M

Mamadun
PRW
30 Dec 2009

Which is the better one, elm or c901? Is the c901 camera better than elm?

Reply

K

Kay123
wrr
30 Dec 2009

The Phone design is very ugly... My K700i and my T68i still looks much much more better than this... It looked like those BenQ phones... How much it cost? $99?

Reply

G

Graz
3Jc
30 Dec 2009

Nightmare on Elm Street more like...Sony Ericsson are getting more niche by the day, what with the "pureness", "greenheart" phones...what happened to walkman and cyber-shot?

Reply

?

Anonymous
UD}
30 Dec 2009

The metallic d-pad will fade in no time. I still remain a skeptic on the build quality of this phone. Maybe my opinion will change when i actually see it. I've seen Naite. The build quality is disgusting. Looked very cheap. The paintwork's poorly done. Used to think Sony Ericsson builds/creates quality phones. But now i don't know.

Reply

?

Anonymous
SmR
30 Dec 2009

"VGA video recording @ 30fps
Video recording: QVGA@15fps video recording"
Line after line on first page "at glance".

Reply

?

Anonymous
3sE
29 Dec 2009

I am so glad SE has brought back the fast port. The extra bulk that the fast port provide when connecting earphones to a SE phone makes the phone look unique and more expensive. Although the fast port is old and outdated technology, I like old school and impracticality.Thank you SE for including the fast port, that is the number one reason why I love this phone. Iphone R.I.P.