C has great detail reproduction. Love it. B has a really strong noise reduction (foliage and colour borders are heavily blurred). The worst one.
phones fan, 05 Oct 20101st row B 2nd row B 3rd row B 4th row C 5th row C iso 400 A iso 800 B6th row C
My personal choise is
1: C (more noise but more detail). Nokia?
2: A Vibrant colors. Pixon?
3: B Sony?
No offence but GSMARENA really brings Samsung everywhere which is just too much these days.
Looks like GSMARENA will bring Pixon to either 1st or 2nd place in the podium; whether it deserves or not, it is a different case.
But blind test is a good idea; I admire that.
1st row B
2nd row B
3rd row B
4th row C
5th row C
iso 400 A
iso 800 B
Anonymous, 05 Oct 2010why is there no comparison of SE Satio because satio cant take pictures without getting stuck.
very clumsy phone.
A is clearly the N8 because of 2 things:
1-the pictures are lighter, just look at the size.
And as we saw in the previous comparison between N8 and pixon,
the n8 had lighter pictures in terms of size (kb,mb, etc..).
2-the nokia n8 as well as the sony digicam use 28mm lens,
and the pixon uses a 30mm len.
first I have to say very clever test gsmarena making people leave all brand loialty behind :)
My personal choise is
First two Id say go to B the rest is all C
did someone saw that review:
nokia n8 camera is not in the same league as the pixon12.
the iphone 4 took better photos than the n8.
pixon12 is the king camera phone, the N8 is far from that.
Fanboykiller!!, 05 Oct 2010Firstly, as a lot of others have stated, this blind test was a great idea, props to you gsmare... morewell said
getting tired of fanboys bashing other fanboys
its about facts and preference
would be great if the GSM Arena can get hold of the Altek Leo
i think it will top N8 since it has a CCD sensor(N8 got CMOS)
got myself laughing at GSM Arenas' post regarding baised reviews of other sites to N8, it had over 1000 comments in just 1 day!he he he...so many blind fanboys...
1) the best is C
I hope is the N8, good detail and color but a bit of noise, it looks like the image quality tuning hasn't been over done as can often be the case.
2) second best is A
I think this is the Sony, less detail but good color and noise.
3) in last place is B
I think this is the Samsung, the colors look a little over saturated and and it is over sharpen in the Y Chanel but over blurred in the UV
Any of these pictures is excellent for a camera phone though.
A >= C >> B,
C > A > B (and ISO400 C >= A > B)
A = Nokia
B = Samsung
C = Sony