the, 23 Feb 2011battery life..?? i've heard samsung droids have very poor battery life...any opinions on the ace..??battery life is good if u wont play games.....if u play games its suck and sice ram is low u cant open too many application ..if u put livewallpaper u r battery goes out sooon
uz, 03 Mar 2011i have this phone u better buy lg optumus one ....ace battery sucks...........................Hi Uz, I have this phone and on day 1 battery only lasted for 6 hrs due to heavy usage. (I used it like a laptop) However I searched the net and found how to optimize android battery. I'm also using a widget that allows me to quickly turn on/off wifi|bluetooth|gps|aSync|brightness this all in conjunction with Advance task killer now battery lasts for almost 1.5 days. I hope this helps you.
I'll be soon updating my blog on battery life of ACE at http://tusharg.blogspot.com
So Galaxy S is the iPhone 3Gs copy, and Galaxy Ace is iPhone 4 copy. Samsung should wait until iPhone 5 is announced, so Galaxy S II could be an iPhone 5 copy.
i have this phone u better buy lg optumus one ....ace battery sucks...........................
ah why is there so many phones being made that can't handle adobe flash 10? it may be resource hungry but with the option to switch the plug-in off it would be great on all phones.
can you tell me how much lag did you encounter while playing demanding games?
BOYBAWANG, 28 Feb 2011should i buy this or a SonyEricsson X10 2.1version ...they have the same price here!you should buy this phone ... its really good ... and its cheaper than x10 ... and has a better version of android os ...
should i buy this or a SonyEricsson X10 2.1version ...they have the same price here!
What about the xperia neo which is also in the middle end range and it trashes the ace in every aspect! So, I'm wondering why did gsmarena ignore this phone as an alternative.
Samsung may be strong in their high end devices, but no offence when it comes to their low-mid end phones they just suck. Their specs are far inferior to other companies.
And the xperia neo from S/E is a good example.
Sorry, I didn't mean that S60v5 was faster, I mean ALOT faster.
Hahaha, just compare how an old Nokia 5800, with a ARM11 437Mhz and no GPU is faster than all those "amazing" Androids.
Seriously, it's inaceptable that a phone with such high clock lags like that... But that's something quite usual on the Android realm, all "non high-end" phone lags. People love to bash Symbian but take a look at most of these Android phones, this thing lags even on menu scrolling, Jesus. Even S60v5 phone were faster than that, with alot less powerfull CPUs and not even a hardware accelerated UI.
this device will be much better if it has more powerful ram and 480p video recoring. i think i would rather buy wild fire S or motorola defy. :p
Couldnt be the video here on ACE, refined with software?
Ive read somewhere this was already done on one Droid phone
The upcoming Sony Ericsson Neo and Pro have better specs than this phone- they come with 1Ghz processors, 8.1 mpx cams, larger 3.7" screens and ,android 2.3. Why should I even think of buying this phone???
Guys, all of you that are prefering defy over this, dont. defy(milestone 1/2 also ) releases some radiations that are hugely harmful and can cause cancer. those who want to buy can take from http://www.letsbuy.com/mobile-phones/gsm-handsets/samsung-mobile-phone/samsung-galaxy-s5830-free-mini-speakers-worth-1290-p-12258.html with free speakers worth rs 1290