GSMArena.com GSMArena.com

Tip us

888k

156k
74k
1.1m

RSS

Log in

Login

I forgot my password
Sign up
  • Home
  • News
  • Reviews
  • Videos
  • Featured
  • Phone Finder
  • DealsNew
  • Tools
  • Coverage
  • Contact
ADVERTISEMENTS
GSMArena team, 10 May 2011

Sony Ericsson XPERIA Neo review Comments

  • Read
  • Comments (81)
  • User reviews
  • Xperia Neo

  • Post your comment
Pages: «12 3 45 »
Sort by:

D
  • AnonD-6173
  • 9CY
  • 12 May 2011

AnonD-3713, 12 May 2011Really? Check out the phone page on GSMArena, maybe you should tell them to correct the mistak... morewhat? you must be smoking or something. with its pricetag, Neo worth every penny. beautiful design, excellent camera, gingerbread, bravia, etc. i bet you are "high number" fan LOL

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
D
  • AnonD-3713
  • L4D
  • 12 May 2011

Anonymous, 12 May 2011It actually costs about 350 euros...Really? Check out the phone page on GSMArena, maybe you should tell them to correct the mistake.
Also, even if it was 350 EUR, it's is too much for this phone, it got simply nothing that stand out from the competition.

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
D
  • AnonD-3713
  • L4D
  • 12 May 2011

AnonD-733, 12 May 2011well for the others brands this is high end phone but for SE it;s mid-range phone that's wh... moreSE leads when the competition got Multi-core CPUs and AMOLED screens? I'm sorry but SE is probably the worst company in the Android realm, the only thing that is good about their phones is design.

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
D
  • AnonD-733
  • nxh
  • 12 May 2011

Anonymous, 11 May 2011"Midrange"? Are you kidding me? This phone costs 450 EUR, it's even more expensive ... morewell for the others brands this is high end phone but for SE it;s mid-range phone

that's why SE lead the others just follow

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
?
  • Anonymous
  • 3XL
  • 12 May 2011

Anonymous, 11 May 2011"Midrange"? Are you kidding me? This phone costs 450 EUR, it's even more expensive ... moreIt actually costs about 350 euros...

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
?
  • Anonymous
  • LpI
  • 11 May 2011

Ahmed, 11 May 2011The camera is great in photo and video comparison tool and better than Arc GSMarena review sa... more"Midrange"? Are you kidding me?
This phone costs 450 EUR, it's even more expensive than Optimus 2x and Galaxy S.
I think that GSMArena point got sense.

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
A
  • Ahmed
  • fvL
  • 11 May 2011

The camera is great in photo and video comparison tool and better than Arc
GSMarena review say's that the camera is average, why?
even the samples are great too.

another comment:
This phone doesn't have full HD video recording and dual core processor
no need for this features in mid range phone

This phone simply is the best in it's class

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
?
  • Anonymous
  • uts
  • 11 May 2011

After reading the whole review, everything in the phone is good but i would still like to see telephony on every android model(smartphone) which sony develops as it is a handy and a very useful feature.

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
h
  • heru prabo
  • KxI
  • 11 May 2011

See it like it try it love it....
See design be difference with the other..
unfortunately when arrive to my country, Indonesia..
hopefully soon....

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
?
  • Anonymous
  • nGJ
  • 11 May 2011

... noone even needs 1080p video - it's overkill that offers little visual difference to 720p, just excessively large video files. ... not to mention that 1080p video kills my laptop!

I'd rather have tweaked camcorder-quality 720p any day, than entering yet another stupid "Megapixel race" that's nothing but marketing BS.

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
R
  • Rize
  • wcd
  • 11 May 2011

I'm really interest in this phone, Camera is important for me, GSMarena said yhat the camera is average but when I take a look on image comparison, it even slightly better than Arc in some area... Im confused

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
D
  • AnonD-6211
  • t7S
  • 11 May 2011

abhi, 11 May 2011Two compeletely weird things in Xperia Neo's review -> 1. Camera quality is a mixed bag(b... moreIm confused. As the preview mentioned that the camera is great. And now the review said that it is not?
Need to find another site for a review to compensate.
The preview has great results and the review is so so? Hmmmm

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
b
  • bulbul
  • Q{x
  • 11 May 2011

just get a second hand N1, the only diff is the camera, and you can bet you will always be the first to get OS updates.

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
D
  • AnonD-691
  • t7y
  • 11 May 2011

Main Disadvantages according to GSM Arena
>Competition have Dual Cores and 1080p HD recording

but Neo is not competing in Dualcore Phones right? this is just a Mid Range All rounder phone >_

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
E
  • EskeRahn
  • 0u3
  • 11 May 2011

I think the review (and others) omits one very crucial thing about the physical dimensions:
ONE HAND OPERABILITY!
This ought to be on the list of "Key features".
(and similar for larger screens the lack of it on the "Main disadvantages")

It is as if gsmarena thinks bigger are just better... It's not!
For all of us not having monkey-hands and 4" thumbs, well then 3.7" is on the limit of what is one hand operable.
Try tacking one on your favourites with a 4.3" screen in one hand and try to touch all four corners...

And If you switch to landscape, even 3.7" is uncomfortable with one hand...

(This is EXACTLY why apply increase the ppi, but stay down at 3.5")

And YES I can hear people complaining about not being able to touch the exact position on a high ppi-screen. Well this is why Gingerbread improved the Text selection as described in the review.

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
?
  • Anonymous
  • Qxp
  • 11 May 2011

is Neo capable of performing 3G video call?
if not, then better buy Samsung i9003 Galaxy SL.

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
D
  • AnonD-691
  • t7y
  • 11 May 2011

Anonymous, 11 May 2011Agreed, it would've been better if it was "Vivaz with Android".totally agree with you, Vivaz shoot in HD too, they must rename the Title to Vivaz in Android

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
?
  • Anonymous
  • 3XL
  • 11 May 2011

Anonymous, 10 May 2011There was no mention of BATTERY LIFE in this review! How can you leave out something so import... moreGood points!

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
?
  • Anonymous
  • 3XL
  • 11 May 2011

Anonymous, 10 May 2011I'm the only one who didn't understand the review title? The original Vivaz also shots HD videos.Agreed, it would've been better if it was "Vivaz with Android".

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
M
  • Mico
  • t7X
  • 11 May 2011

Well i guess, wave II's hardware is better than this but in software it wins, it also dont support divx,. How sad, i thought i'll be glad that this phone is better than wave II.

  • Rating0 |
  • Reply
  • Report
  • Post your comment
Pages: «12 3 45 »
Sort by:

ADVERTISEMENTS

Phone finder

  • Samsung
  • Apple
  • Huawei
  • Nokia
  • Sony
  • LG
  • HTC
  • Motorola
  • Lenovo
  • Xiaomi
  • Google
  • Honor
  • Oppo
  • Realme
  • OnePlus
  • vivo
  • Meizu
  • BlackBerry
  • Asus
  • Alcatel
  • ZTE
  • Microsoft
  • Vodafone
  • Energizer
  • Cat
  • Sharp
  • Micromax
  • Infinix
  • Ulefone
  • Tecno
  • BLU
  • Acer
  • Wiko
  • Panasonic
  • verykool
  • Plum

All brands Rumor mill

ADVERTISEMENTS

Popular reviews

Apple iOS 14 review

Apple iOS 14 review
Android 11 review

Android 11 review
Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra review

Xiaomi Mi 10 Ultra review

Related articles

  • Flashback: the Sony Ericsson K800 was as versatile as James Bond and the first Cyber-shot phone
  • Flashback: Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 mini, the smallest Android with the biggest heart
  • Flashback: (Sony) Ericsson T68 and the add-on camera that made it famous
  • Flashback: Sony Ericsson Xperia X10 fixed past mistakes by choosing Android
ADVERTISEMENTS

Home News Reviews Compare Coverage Glossary FAQ RSS feed Youtube Facebook Twitter Instagram

© 2000-2021 GSMArena.com Mobile version Android app Contact us Privacy Terms of use Change Ad Consent Do not sell my data