The Boy with Red Hat, 17 Jun 2011LoL hurt fellings about SG2 didn't win clear this one, but is true, there is some more phones ... moreCouldn't expect more from a Nokia fanboy. Really ? There are better ones ? Then tell me, which phone is overall better than galaxy sII and cost a "LOT" less ? Name some.
i dont understand why these companies are not future proofing their phones which could hav been done using today's technology....customers r ready to pay the quoted price tags...why cant u understand smartphone companies???u try to grab money from customers again and again with non future proofed fone???customers shud become gods 4 u...they r purchasing ur products and they give u food indirectly...u try 2 cheat them...shame on u....
S2 is a monster! Video is amazing!..but dint find anythin striking in the UI. Wish they could just let go of KIES..Its more of a burden..But a great phone!!loving it!
Just bought my samsung galaxy s 2
Is truely a monster
Loving ot to the core(dual core on this case);)
I think its a good and balanced comparison and I liked it. Most of the important factors have been put in comparison and at the end it gives you your chance to choose the best according to your needs. For me according to this review SGS II is the best(5 meters in GPS accuracy is not a big difference for me, its working fine). The reason that theres more comments about sensation in this comparison is that SGS II and O2X have been already put head to head but Sensation is the new comer, so its natural there will be more comments and explanation about it...
hey hey hey Lads n Gents of GSMARENA...even im sure most of you are male :D (hahahahah don't bothered :p).....HAPPY BIRTHDAY!!!! u guyz Rock!!, this is like my default website when it comes to smartphones :))
but sometimes i don't agree with some of the articles, but i can possibly understand, u guyz did awesome job especially about Head to Head of Smartphone..so keep up the good work!!
ou yea, just an add from me, try to make a quiz or something, and reply our comments, if you guyz don't mind :D, just an ideas from ur Fan!
Thank You :)
Didi, 17 Jun 2011it has to be Droid!! not SymbianSo iPhone is droid huh? :P They have already published a dedicated battery test for N8 and they say that browser is the not among the best.. So they didn't consider it..
Just see the Conclusion,,, How strange it is.Just Talk about HTC... means come to bad ads... Shame on you....
with All these Bad Advertisment about HTC sensation ,,,WE STILL LOVE IT>>>>>> Its clear that this article comes to destroy HTC.... but if you take Sensation in your hand and work with it,,,With New Sense you cant Leave it Why YOU GSMARENA didnt Compare User Interface?????HTC rocks With its Interface,,Means you wont feel boring when you work with it,.... Sensation Can Handle All you need.... Trust me.... Its not important to me what benchmark shows.The things that important to me is Sensation Can do What ever I want from a handset,,, PLEASE THINK WISELY
The Boy with Red Hat, 17 Jun 2011LoL hurt fellings about SG2 didn't win clear this one, but is true, there is some more phones ... moreScreen, camera (both stills and vids), battery, benchmarks, browsing performance... SGSII takes win in majority of the tested features. "Clear winner" is in fact obvious, though the winner comes short on couple of the features. Win is a win.
LoL hurt fellings about SG2 didn't win clear this one, but is true, there is some more phones with more performance than others.
SG2 have a batterie pealty and a crappy GPS, but still a good phone, but again there's betters and cost a lot less than SG2.
And reading the tests is clear for me SG2 is all but not a king performer over all the other phones. :D
HTC Sensation is a bit of a FAILURE. Maybe 3rd or 4th place next to SGS2, 2X and Atrix.
Happy birthday to GSM ARENA..
You all did a good test. Unlike other commenters, I think this time your review is neutral.
Either way, the choice is us to choose.
As for me, Samsung is a winner from technical wise.
HTC is a winner from build quality wise (including the UI).
LG is a winner from price/performance value wise.
But if money is not a factor, I still choose HTC Sensation...;)
unreliable comparison, I mean gsmarena made lg 2x to be the underdog here and that is not fair,lg 2x is better than this review. I am not an lg fan but the review made some turnarounds and not direct to the point among those 3 phones mentioned, take note "those 3 phones mentioned"
Wow. This is a great review. There's just one thing. I believe that the Sensation achieved such good video playback time benchmarks because of the lower bitrate.
What a very biased review. They included the iPhone 4 on the battery test but not the Nokia N8. Why? My Nokia N8 is the reigning champ when it comes to battery tests and camera.
Actually I find this review to be very helpful. The writer obviously concentrates on the sensation because they already compared the optimus 2X to the Galaxy S2. To those complaining about not using scores it is very clear which one wins in each department. for example the sensation has the best audio output which is the first time I guess htc beat Samsung in this case. The galaxy s2 has the best combination of CPU,GPU and Ram and it has got the best display.
This is probably the WORST review on GSMARENA. This is not because his various tests were not extensive enough, but because the conclusion of this article failed.
The conclusion killed off the whole article and made me think what was the reason for this review.
I will kindly refer this reviewer to these articles in order to do a better job next time and to probably get some brain.
1. Galaxy S vs Iphone 4 (Score points was employed here to help determine the winner)
2. Optimus 2x vs Galaxy SII (the conclusion was meaningful even though the reviewer still gave the readers chance to make to their own choice)