Anonymous, 03 May 2012this sunspider score is tragic comparing to the same hardware HTCsensation XL, Android is 2-3 ... moreBecause Android uses WebKit, the same base with Apple's Safari. WP uses IE. See the HUGE difference? I have a 1GHz single core android phone which scores around 70000+ in Browsermark and around 2000 in SunSpider (lower is better in SunSpider)
my lumia 900 is very cool. i thing wp is better than android and better than symbian.
Anonymous, 03 May 2012you suck! sensation xe has snapdragon s2 1core 1,5ghz and 512mb ram, adreno 205 and resolution... moresensastion has more ram, dual core and faster gpu
but its browsing experience is worse that the first titan
see this video
and come back to say that sensation is better
safwan, 03 May 2012Bcuz Ure AndroCRAP Uses Dual/Quad Core CPUs For That Performance, Wait For WP8 Devices With Du... moreyou suck! sensation xe has snapdragon s2 1core 1,5ghz and 512mb ram, adreno 205 and resolution of 480x800 and whole phone is exactly the same as titan with WP, but android can load pages in 2-3 times faster see sunspider and browsermark ... and sensation can work longer on battery
They using dead platform anyway by the time w8 is elease nokia will have less 5% smartphone market share
Muneeb786, 03 May 2012Because WP is smooth, easy and beautifully Coded operating system. Best Os i have used till no... morewhy cant do benchmarks better than others dual- quadcores phones?. still dont get it
Anonymous, 03 May 2012this sunspider score is tragic comparing to the same hardware HTCsensation XL, Android is 2-3 ... moreBcuz Ure AndroCRAP Uses Dual/Quad Core CPUs For That Performance, Wait For WP8 Devices With Dual-Core & See the Magic!!!
superpiff, 03 May 2012How can you say the titan 2 has a generic design because it looks similar to other HTC devices... moreDude, Lumia 900 Has A Eye-Catching Desing, Where The Titan 2 Has the same-Boring-Ugly Desing.... Thats What GSMArena Meant ;)
How can you say the titan 2 has a generic design because it looks similar to other HTC devices? The Lumia 900 is an exact replica of the n9 and the lumia 800.
this sunspider score is tragic comparing to the same hardware HTCsensation XL, Android is 2-3 times faster in web browser. And applications starts slower but because of animations you don't see that. bye bye slow WP
Drfajardo, 03 May 2012plz, i just want to know. why can wp do it so well with this low benchmarks? (against sammy2 f... moreBecause WP is smooth, easy and beautifully Coded operating system.
Best Os i have used till now. Not even restarted or freezed a single time.
I LOVE MY NOKIA LUMIA 710.
just in first words of an article it is obvious that you like nokia better, but do not forget that nokia has very low max brightness of screen, jut 173,5 nits and very delicate rear shiny element (iPhone has whole back shiny so that's why it is selling so good)
I could buy both, but I think I'm going to choose Lumia. It has much better design, even display is maybe too small. I have now iPhone4 and I really want a bigger display.
Well..just quite disappointing!! 16mp and so crappy quality???so much LOW sharpness!very low dynamic range! noise and croma noise purple fringing and generally htc titan's II samples look like 3 or 5 megapixels! even the n82 produce much better pics thanks to the high quality Carl Zeiss optics! htc for sure choce very cheap optics and that's for shame! 16mp market logo is only on words!!! that's such a pitty!!
You forgot to mention the best part with the Lumia-phone; free navigation and free music. Does that also come with the HTC? NO.
i'm very interested in getting WP but what hold me back is the lack of arabic language and recently i found out based on the reviews that the battery sucks big time ... i wish if GSmarena will post the battery test of HTC Titan 1
the still photo quality is way better on the Titan II... just look at the photo samples!
"The dynamic range is pretty great though and it's probably the strongest argument in favor of the Nokia WP flagship as most cameraphones suffer from reduced dynamic range."
I have to disagree on this because the sample pics, when there's more light on them, are just more underexposed. Otherwise the highlights would have been blow out as expected from a tiny pixel sensor.
And a real measuring scale on dynamic range ala dpreview would show that clearly.