Samsung Galaxy Camera review Comments

• AnonD-3575
• 3LU
• 25 Jan 2013

AnonD-3928, 25 Jan 2013So its niether a good camera( 500 $) nor a phone. Dats a lot of money for a pointless product.... moreyep, im not moving to wp unless i see a xenon flash

• Reply

• AnonD-3928
• uu4
• 25 Jan 2013

So its niether a good camera( 500 $) nor a phone. Dats a lot of money for a pointless product. Plus a puny battery which can only last for few shots. Wats d point in providing quad core when u cant use it coz of smaller battery....

But samsung should be applauded for their effort.their intentions were good but outcome unsatisfactory...though they arent first company, nokia way back gave a product with 3x optical zoom when samsung didn even knew abc of mobile phones....lets hope nokias eos is as good a product as808 camera wise

• Reply

• AnonD-3575
• 3LU
• 25 Jan 2013

so, a pointless device
waiting for nokia eos, i suppose

• Reply