Being a WP lover, I love Lumias and also I am a Windows fanboy. Here, I like this phone as well. Great features packed in a hand instrument. Everything is excellent, just the build quality :-/ I would appreciate it if they would have made their flagship with aluminium instead of plastic. Just its look makes me stop buying it although I got the money to own around 20's at a time :D
Just will try it once :)
., 28 Mar 2013This phone sucks. It's made for masses, people with no identity..But we cant judge how people select their phones. Not everyone was born to stand out, but quite the opposite, most people in this world are trying to FIT IN, and then its good to borrow the identity of the crowd, and if Samsung can play on peoples need to identify themselves with others, to be part of something, then they can sell that many more phones.
Identity comes at a price, its not the easiest path to walk. Some 4-5 years ago i would laugh quietly at grown up men in Converse AllStars shoes, now i use them myself. Where does "identity" end, when does it become weird to stand out? Dont cross that line, its ok to have an Xperia or HTC, but if you go to far, like Lumia or BB, then its already weird.
., 28 Mar 2013This phone sucks. It's made for masses, people with no identity..These are the perfect words.
LG Optimus G pro is still better
s4 COPIED DUAL VIDEO, Q TRANSLATOR, Q-REMOTE
i believe this year for the koreans SAMSUNG & LG
., 28 Mar 2013This phone sucks. It's made for masses, people with no identity..i agreee with you.. on top of that, its the ugliest phone on the market.
a so called flagship that looks cheaper than a feature phone.
samsung's just riding the wave with android.. we'll see samsung's true skill when we see what they do with tizen OS (likely not much)
Good cam, i like it, but it makes no miracles over the Xperia Z. I wonder what it will be in real life usage, because the best cam i had on a phone was with the Note 2, but the Note 2 was also the one to produce most failed shots under not optimal conditions, while the Z has never failed me yet. I think Samsungs cam software is good only under optimal conditions, and this may be a problem for S4 as well. Great synthetic performance but low practial performance.
I dont mean to troll anyway, i be honest enough to say that theres no way i would consider an S4, i already had my dose of samsung the half year i had Note 2. Still, i like to compare the cams of S4 and Z, same Sony sensor and everything, fair enough i hope =)
QUOTE " Samsung galaxy s4 will be as revolutionary as t.v's when they went from black and white to colour "
BIG CLAIM !
I am not so sure ! or very sure and NO NO NO
Anonymous, 28 Mar 2013well you can expect the audio to be the best like it always has been. this phone is so choke f... morewell i had the sgs2,sgs3.galaxy note 2 and now the galaxy note 2 lte..the and the audio quality was excellent but a bit on the quiet side tho.but i got over it.!!!
well you can expect the audio to be the best like it always has been. this phone is so choke full of features, why would anyone spend money on other phones lol.
., 28 Mar 2013This phone sucks. It's made for masses, people with no identity..Yes u r right. Btw samsung camera always sucks!