You forgot Motorola RAZR D1, same specs, more RAM (1 GB), better battery (1785 mAh), BSI and HDR on camera, better video recording (480p), but no flash, no NFC, in my country (Mexico), D1 is cheaper.
Samsung Mobiles are good if we want to buy best mobile in less cost.
Anonymous, 17 May 2013no. lg? big batt. smartphones which never got any updates. yes i know lg made the first ... moreguy l3 not suitable for gaming LoL... its is budget phone for gaming better buy l7/l9 or higher like f5 f7, awesome!
dreamhigh, 17 May 2013better buy lg L series(first/second gen) better hardware no. lg?
big batt. smartphones which never got any updates.
yes i know lg made the first dual core, first capacitive, first rounded corners phone and m0re, but they was always been exceeded by samsung and software.
my friend has l3. 125 ppi. always restartng and can
play temple lag. angry lag and candy brush lag
Thanks for the review Gsmarena
I care about the effort you put for every device wish you the best of all times
kill-for-exclusivity, 17 May 2013So with better optimization , Android can run smooth on a single core processoryeah right.
low spec'd phone+great software from samsung= great smartphone experience.
So with better optimization , Android can run smooth on a single core processor
What a shameful device when considering that's it's made by a electronics giant with infinite in-house components and infinite money on the side to be 'sacrifized' for a top budget device that could 'rule them all'. Companies like Nokia and Sony which suffer major financial problems (one after the other) seem to 'care more' and 'sacrifize more' resources in favour for budget users/ emerging markets. Once again, what a MAJOR shame to rebrand yesterday's technology under the name of Galaxy, all in the name of greediness and zero interest in contributing to technological advancement of societies with 'disabilities'/ 'disadvantages'