When we tested the device in Moscow, it worked for about 3 days in case of 50 minutes of talks and up to 20 minutes of using other functions (alarm clock, camera, organizer). Using Bluetooth permanently decreases battery life to only one day (30 minutes of talks and up to 25 minutes of using other functions). To tell the truth, it's hard to discharge the battery in a day, even those speaking much on the phone will stay pleased. Generally, battery life will probably form 2-3 days for the majority of users. Recharging the battery will take about 2 hours.
Talktime is 3 hours, not the entire battery life! Jeez.
c'mon dont be lazy, u herd of such thing as a charger lol im only joking, 3 hours isnt good!
I fink dat da samsung d600 is well cool!!!
n i mint b gettin 1 but i dont no wich fone t get wat d u fink?!
by the way south yorkshire rules!!!!!
lol luv y'll!
Well, all we have to do is wait and see.
I don't belive that the battery will last for only 3 hours.. If it does.. It's a BIG BIG mistake. I don't think Samsung is making that mistake after delaying the release date until now.
I hope they did something to the batteries.
coming from the nokia 6630 which has a 3hr talktime this looks like i wont end up buying it.Will have to see real reports.its always a shame when theres 1600milliamp batterrys out there and lithium polymers and most of the top 5 mobile companys put silly batts in.Panasonic have done it and my last 2 s/e were lithium polymer with 16 day 12-16 hour talktimes,,maybe ive missed something over the past 6 yrs of buying mobiles but price cant be the issue and they are small enough and light.They come out with some great fones like the d600 and let it down with batt,,all the features have increased mainly screen etc but they forget to balance the battery consumption and there the expert engineers.
This puppy is on display/demo at the samsung showroom of the Time Warner Towers in NYC...
It is just amazing! If you have a chance to go there, they'll walk you through all the features... Have fun!
Yeah but have you ever plugged in your PC on your TV and if yes did you see anything clearly while trying to read the text? i did and trust me your eyes will hurt a lot...
but again i ll get one for 3 reasons : beautiful phone, good sliding system and the outstanding videos :)
For the rest i keep the K750 and my PDA!!
Yup! pictures,videos,ms powerpoint presentations,excel sheets,pdf,doc,txt files,.bmp,.gif all can be viewed on TV!
visit: www.mobile-review.com and read the review carefully at the end!
I think that this phone looks amzing. The specs for it a outstanding.It has a 2 mega pixel camera with flash. A high quality screen a Mp3 player and bluetooth , but I still think that the Sony Ericson k750i is still better.
Does anybody know if with TV out you can see both photos and videos on your TV screen?
A few things i d like to clarify...
first, I love Samsung Phones (quality, design...)
I have a D500 a K750 and i m selling phones every day so i have tested every Samsung phones (E530, Z500, Z140, E620....)
and i just think that there are very few innovations on each new phones (not to say none...) besides the nice screen and the TV out plug D600 presents nothing new compared to other phones on the market (they are always the last to put new technologies on the high end phone (see bluetooth...)
Again Samsung phones are really great, I still love my D500 but i just think that it was outdated when it came out and think that the D600 will soon be outdated too.
amen, i've seen those 2'0 inch QVGA screens, and it just makes you mezmerized, and u keep staring at the screen screamin' "holy sh**! how can they put so many dots (pixels) into the screen!"...the difference between D600 QVGA and SONYERICSSON S700 QVGA is that they have DIFFERENT SIZES!! Samsung D600 = 2 inch QVGA///// SONYERICSSON S700 = 2.4 inch QVGA. And if your smart enough to realize that Samsung QVGA is much more vivid and clear, cuz those pixels are tightly squeezed into the 2'0 inch screen, whereas S700 or Panasonic phones have larger QVGA which means LESS CLARITY THAN D600.
D600 doesn't have crippled MP3's, you can even download lyrics and OGG files...it has real equilizer which compensates the sound output thru earphones, besides holds 2nd place in MP3 market (apple #1)...the mp3's you hear thru the phone doesn't loose any kilo bytes p/s playbacks unlike nokia phones, ex) When 128 kbps mp3 is played thru nokia phone, its playback is waned to 122 kbps.
So y'all Samsung haters shud stop givin' false information, and making freudal attempts to deter as much as people from buying Samsung mobile phones.
ppl who never saw a QVGA screen will never know what I'm talking about. When watching a movie on ur screen or watching photos on ur screen it's a huge advantage. Ppl around you will go like "WOW!" And how do you know if the mp3 on D600 sux?
In the review it says it doesn't have much difference with k750 or other phones.
And about the picture quality I already said.
I'm getting tired of this.. saying what I said again and again.. geez
I'm not trying to slate down k750 but u guys who keep say k750 is better than D600 in this forum.. get a life.
I won't buy a phone with such a small screen and a LOW resolution.
When buying a phone, besides it making a phone call the second important thing is entertainment. k750i only has the fun of taking pictures and listening to music.. which. But it's not as good as the digital camera or a mp3 player. Ofcourse it's a phone. But D600 has EVERYTHING. Camera, mp3, and movie on a HIGH quality screen. You can also have the fun of surfing the internet becuz it has the picsel viewer.
Again, k750 and D600 cannot be compared.
k750 lacks too many features.
Lol, still waiting this phone?
i think it's allready outdated and samsung menus sux ( no themes, can't put MP3 as an sms tone nor as a waking up tone...)
I've seen photos taken by the D600 they re noisy and pretty much blurred...
Those who compare the k750 with the D600 are right the k750 is much more customable and it does really beautiful photos ( i only use the k750 to take my daylight photos...) Autofocus, macro mode auto white balance... And of course you can do everything with your own MP3s (SMS, Wake up..). And i can keep my K750 charged up a week just using phone calls and photos.
Ok there is no TV out on the SE but do you think you can watch anything else than photos on a TV screen ? And remember it's not a real inovation (Sharp 902...) and it's crap.
Just my 2 copper... And yes i have a K750 and i will have a D600 for it's design but for the rest i keep my SE!
I understand what your saying pal but T.V output on a phone!!! Its a bit much don't you think.
To everyone else
I get really annoyed with some people who slate other phones on forums. If people have an opinion on a handset then have your say but don't compare to other phones and have a go about it. I may have expressed myself strongly in the past and for that i apologise for this, especially to noname and bob but please don't slate a phone just cos it does not have the same specs as the phone you like. all phones are different and thats why we have a choice out there. The N91 is better in some ways to a D600 and not in others so there is no comparison really which is what i have tried to say in the past. If you don't like nokia then fine, choose and alternative. Freedom of choice. Simple as that. I will stick with the N91 but if it fails to deliver then a D600 is the next port of call. Thats my choice.