I am intrested in buying this phone! Can someone please tell me his good and bad sides!
thnx alot 4 telling me kal. do u have that phone (samsung d840)? xox jess xox cheers!
Well "Jess" look at the pictures..I can see a little hole on the top right corner of the base..just above the microSD card slot.
Owners may confirm.
can u put phone charms on the samsung D840? plzzzzzzzzzzzzzz tell mi peeps! thnx xx
this phone is realy nice, ma bro bought 1 and i am looking 2 buy 1 myself
Appreciate your reserach work "Atanas".
Just a little correction, Moto is in the second spot with 21.8% market share.
I forgot to add something about brands marketing:
In the last months Nokia has about 35% of the world market - Samsung is the second competitor with about 11%. When you are the world leader and something like monopolist - Nokia, you hardly will sell high-quality phones with small profit. Just see the price of the new Nseries, and compare to the other 3MP phones. Although Nokia is only phone manufacturer, Samsung produce TVs, Cameras, Pcs.........
Samsung has the resource to invest in low-price high quality phones, to steal the markets from Nokia. This is just a market strategy. When Samsung become a kind of monopolist with two times more market place compared to the second manufacturer, may be samsung prices will be a lot higher. But in this moment is much more relieble to invest your money in high-range brand Samsung than to the cheapest Nokia. In other case you pay an extra money only for the Brand, but not for the quality.
In fact, I did a big market research for about 3 months.
Most of Nokia phones are sturdy and stable, but thay had very poor (low quality) features. Moreover, most of them hav high SAR radiation level. Not good
Sony Erricson has high quality features (not very rich but enough features for a standart mobile - like camera and mp3). But they are known with extremely short-life construction quality - scratched screen and surface, f*cked up joystick - theese things are law for SE. Although the quality of cameras for exmp.
Samsung has not the best bateries, but in most cases has the lowest radiation level! D600 has 0.4 w/kg, x700 has 0.19w/kg -amazing. k750 for exmp. has 0.99w/kg. 6630 - 0.85 w/kg and so on...
Samsung phones are the most featured non-smarth phones on the market: well, still fast like normal phone (smarth phones are vary slower - no doubth, and much more unstable for a phone - just annoying). Almost every newer samsung phone has Picsel viewer - for viewing MS Office docs like Nokia Nseries - but a lot faster. Well, I think this is one of the most wanted function of so called smarthphones, considering this is a phone, not computer.
Samsung has a lot better cameras than nokia and a lot better video than SE.
In the construction quality samsung is a lot better than SE and compared to Nokia. I can say that becouse my girlfriend has samsung e720 on 1 year and it is looking like new, altough she had dropped it a LOT!
In my research, a find out that samsung d600 is the best price/quality/safity(SAR radiation)/features phone on the market.
Kal, you have never seen anything yet!!! This phone 's build quality is questionable. It soung creaky & the plastic feels cheap & is actually cheap.
Samsung doest use cheap plastics and they are knwon to have the best slide mechanism in the market.
Thats what all the reviews says.Go read.
and STOP USING MY NAME to post negetive comments.