it's a good thing 2 notice tat e ratings is improving everytime i cx on e gsm site. : )
Its very good. there is everything i need;bluetooth,additionnal memory(can add a 1gb sd card),high resolution camera,mp3/mp4 player.
It is a 4 in 1 for me;digital cam,mp3 player,mobile phone and multimedia sharing device.
I am going to have this one
Motorola is having a hard time to put 3.2megapixel camera with fully loaded features in a phone and only SAMSUNG has done that along with LG. NOKIA and SONY ERICSSON? both having huge phones? forget it.
can u not understand that sony has already lost its glory. Samsung now is the star in digital era while sony had its time in the analog era. Why can't you SE fans accept that SONY and ERICSSON both once the leading force in electronics has to merge because they cannot compete alone. Samsung products are one of the best now a days surpassing even the once great but now struggling sony. Sony cannot even surpass LG in mobile market share. Then why bother comparing sony to samsung which has more than twice the market share of sonyericsson.
I trust samsung mobile phones because they always tested all their phones in their country first before releasing it all over the world while other companies are fast releasing thier mobile products without long term testing which resulted to short term reliability.
Its interesting to read about last few post here and I couldn't resist the temptation to add some more.
For long mobile phone considered to be for communication only and Nokia, Motorola being the leaders, were doing great.Still they are number one and two. But time has changed and now a cell phone doesn't mean only for communication. Its time to have as much thing as possible in one device that we carry around. and their comes Samsung and Sony-Ericsson.
Camera/camcorder/mp3 player/computers, these are the fields that Sony has been mastering for long. I do agree with "Ajay", when it comes to camcorder or a laptop or a CD walkman one can trust Sony without a second thought. But you cant be the master in all. Regardless of award winning fd trinitron picture tube, It is Samsung who is leader in display technology. Sony makes good digital cameras. But I would rather buy a Nikon or Canon when it comes to digicam. When it comes to mp3 player I would buy an iPod. Sony has been in the field from 1930, but my dear we are talking about cell phone here. From when they got paired up with Ericsson?..of course not 1930. I'm not saying
Sony is no good..they are best in certain field and they have the biggest potential among all as well.
Now take a look at Samsung. First of all its the Korea-Japan market which is leading the cell phone industry. Everyone releases their new model there first. Samsung/LG being Korean company try out there new invention in there and by the time they release it to the rest of world, Motorola or Nokia already had a competing model in the market and people say hey that's a copy. Samsung is in all the fields, be it digital camera/mp3 player/display technology/computers/cell phone. That's the advantage of Samsung, they don't have to merge with another company to have any technology.Yes I agree when you compared it to Sony, Samsung camera or camcorder doesn't do that good. But still in cell phone with all the features, they are a little ahead of SE.
In fact it should be the Samsung and SE that should replace Nokia or Motorola in coming days.
Nokia or Motorola does not have those technologies in-house. They are trying hard to keep up. Nokia is well known for the user-friendlyness of their software so its not a big problem for them to incorporate those features, so they are doing good. But I feel bad looking at Motorola..they are still trying to short out their software problems. And they will be the 1st one lose the 2nd spot. I think its high time they merge with a company who has expertise on those field, like how Ericsson has with Sony or now BenQ has with Seimens.
Interesting people should comment that SE make the best phones; I do agree, in terms of all aspects of phone quality - the style, reliability, features, size, value etc etc.
Samsung, a Korean brand (so is LG) has been leading in phone features - in memory capacity and specially in cameras. 3.2MP is not new, Sharp had it for some time now, as well as Toshiba and the new SE W800.
Samsung however, must be considered as a threatening force as it confidently accels in its phone technology. In Korea, 5MP camera phone had been ordinary in 2004. Now attempting at 10MP. Leading brands, SE, NOKIA are pouring tears trying to fit in 3.2MP. This does not make Samsung the best phone company. I still go for SE. There are many reasons for this.
Brivia is joint venture, man. Joint venture and stealing are different. + why are you trying to connect Brivia and cell phone, totally different category.
If anything, sony steal there products from samsung. for instance the screens in sony bravia plasma's are actually bought from samsung.
What do you need the infrared for ?
To transfer files to phone or any other device that only has infrared.