samsung's really concerned abt the screen...
Of course they r big enough and even they work a lot on the camera clarity and picture resolution........Good Stuff... Plz do enhance the Zoom capacity........
"ii"...black/silver will always be the color for electronic iteams...what u want Orange? like SE phones?
Not all phones are suited for other colors...have a look at E870 that comes with different colors.
Atleast Samsung is offereing different form factors and not just adding some colors and reasing old models like Motorolla.
All I wanna know is one thing. Does it have the same kind of privacy level as the D600 so no one can look at your texts, pics, music without a password? Cause thats the only thing right now which is stopping me getting another Samsung past the D600.
Oh my! Surely getting this as soon as its release! When will it be release! Let it out fast SAMSUNG! LET IT OUT!!!
Looks like a GREAT phone. I have a D600 and its serving me well. I know it will be cheaper than those Nokias............. way to go Samsung! keep up the good work and u will be rewarded with a larger share of the market.
A 3.2mp camera offers more than a 1.3mpx. When you have a 3.2 is like having a 1.3 and a 2.0...is up to you how to use the picture size. my point is that a phone might look great but it it might be a bad phone(like motorola v3). and if the phone has a 1.3 or a 3.2 in the end its how good the camera is. i prefer a 1.3 great camera than a 3.2 cruppy one. But for know its pointless to talk when the phone is not out yet. i really hope it will be great cause i would like this to be my next phone
my mistake i meant to say Nokia and SE are not concerned about the look and making dull looking phones and they are not bothered about the wieight either. Nokia phones are so heavy..you cant keep them in ur shirt pocket.. they are not compromising on quality but, they can never reach the quality of a music player like ipod or a dedicated digital camera either.
Bottom line is, Samsung is doing well. You DO NOT need such a good mp3 player or a digital camera in your phone.
That's where Samsung has an edge over other brands. They have most of the features still the model looks way better than the rest and it's light weight.
abouts the 1.3 mpx vs 3.2 and over mpx camera... I do belive that its worthless. It depeneds on ur purpose. Even if you have a 3.2mpx cam..you have to take the picture in low resolution if you want to send it through MMS to othet cell phones. (coz there is file size restriction in MMS). if you have a 3.2mpx cam, well you can take a nice picture save it in your computer and then print it(thats where it will matter who has a good camera, lens and auto focus)..but can u send that file to others over email or over bluetooth or MMS?..NO you have resize it to 640X48. or 600x800 and when you do that it all looks same, no matter it's nokia or samsung or sharp or anything.
People are going crazy buying nokia N91 for over 1000USD coz the sound quality is good. When they will grow some brain that no matter how good it is, it can't beat ipod in quality and battery life. My point is we love to have all te features..a nice looking phone with mp3/video and resonably good camera...and samsung just offer that. Nokia and SE for some reason forgot that its after all a phone and they are concerned about the phones look or weight.
I love Samsung for that.
people always talks abt SE k800 and Nokia n93 and N73 but they dont talk abt D870 and EF91 benq-siemens why? those phones got the same camera specs. except optical zoom(n93) i hope GSM arena camera test wil finish all arguments
i dont think this phone will be great. its todays technology just packed in a small device, nothing new to offer. i hope samsung wont compromize the quality of the phones features just for the sake of a small device.
i mean sharp 903 has a one of the best 3.2 mp camera with optical zoom and great video capabilities. this phone has also a 3mp camera but will be better than a last year mobile phone's camera????
It gotta be perfect,wonder how Ssung squeez all goodies into such thin/small&light handset,it does make Nokia&SE&Motorola look like schoolboys and for sure they're hardly kept up(take a close look at NK N80&SE K800).Well done Mr Sam,keeping up the good works,hope you'll release the phone soon and hope that the price is not huge.
Here is the E870
..this is D870.
If this one is actually the E870 in the UK, it is down for release in o2 stores on 29th May. If not, which one is the E870?!?
i heard its out in the UK in time 4 christmas, but im not 100% sure, any1 clearer than m? i really want this fone!
holy sh** 93 grams only?? And it has 3.2 mega pixel camera with auto focus? OMG
Good Bye O2, Nokia and Sony
Hello D870 Please release it now, I can’t wait…..
What are you talking about. Nokia phones are having features but gaining weight..190..180..150g. Nothing is under 100g.You cant keep them in your shirt pocket...doesnt look like they are concerned about it either.
I see nokia being driven into a samsung fright, they're trying to cram everthing inside the puny little device, almost weighing 0.2 kilogram, in order to stay in the boundaries of competition. Samsung has a nice tactic of slowly adding new features to their phone to make other companies tremble.
Samsung have now sign up to get chips to put radios on there mobiles so they will put more pressure on Nokia an Sony Ericcson get radio on this mobile Samsung an i am sure you would be in a 3 course race with the Nokia N80 an Sony Ericsson K800i to win the mobile of the 1st half of 2006