Samsung F250 - user opinions and reviews

• Shah
• vwt
• 13 Dec 2007

Its the same Carbon copy of N81 ! wow wat a copy !

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• red lazaro
• wwN
• 12 Dec 2007

i think this ones better if produced with 5 megapixel camera,and 3G provided.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• SP1
• myP
• 12 Dec 2007

Looks good but 160x120 65k screen. Why???

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• neo
• w47
• 11 Dec 2007

shivam n81 was out on internet leaked with pictures and possible specs way back as 7-8 months . please google it a little and u will find it , so whatever you are saying is purely baseless

there is no need for samsung to be so unimaginative and stupid in producing this particular phone

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Shivam
• Uqq
• 10 Dec 2007

To everyone who says its a copy of N81, take in consideration that it takes many months to develop a cellphone (its looks, hardware, software, etc.). The N81 has been hardly out for 1 or 2 months and Samsung couldn't possibly 'rip off the design' in that time. I'm sure they didn't go like "Gosh, We've got the software and spec sheet ready, lets wait for Nokia to release a cellphone so we can 'rip it off' ".
Use your heads.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• gka3000
• w9J
• 10 Dec 2007

samsung offers phones with style than the options so if we are buying samsung then we are paying for none other than the style ... style coasts money ... if i need good options in my phone i will probably go for nokia ... but i must say nokia is also releasing so many stylish phones lately but they dont coast much cuz of the style but becuz of the options ... i think nokia is better in everything ... thats why nokia is the no. 1 best selling phone model around the world ... nokia rules ...

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• milcho
• nUC
• 09 Dec 2007

i would buy this phone to my mom. it looks great, no matter bad camera... i like it :) not bad. and it should be cheap :) i expect it to be around 150$

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• MK
• niI
• 09 Dec 2007

very N81-look-a-like

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Anonymous
• Sax
• 09 Dec 2007

Sorry , but samsung slow technology . Please take idea from nokia or sony ericsson ....

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• souhla
• Sq0
• 08 Dec 2007

I really like the design, very nice

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• moshimaru
• PZt
• 07 Dec 2007

the design is soo good for a mid-low end phone...it's better if it's made a mid or high end one...too bad...

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Justin
• NaD
• 07 Dec 2007

Not a worthwhile phone to buy, to much like a E250

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• haseious
• Y7B
• 07 Dec 2007

wow, samsung. you're slowly slitting your own throat.
when are you ever gonna be anywhere NEAR innovative?

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Dan
• PSu
• 07 Dec 2007

This is a low end phone from samsung its designed to be cheap so there is not 5 mp camera qvga screen stuff like that this is 1/5 of the price of nokia's top stuff

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Anonymous
• pTe
• 07 Dec 2007

voting for this phone depend on price .features is low.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Anonymous
• mXD
• 06 Dec 2007

slick design . . . x

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Anonymous
• 0aZ
• 06 Dec 2007

wow thats a horrible screen, 128x160 in 2 inches, usually its 240x320

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• blah
• q{S
• 06 Dec 2007

copy of N81????!?!?!

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Keoz
• phW
• 06 Dec 2007

looks good

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Rafsan
• 2F2
• 06 Dec 2007

Im first.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report