We the smsng fans expect more ,we don't want traditional technologies ...!
Display ONLY 256K (FAIL),camera ONLY (2)MP=(FAIL)!!. ;(Where is Samsung new innovation???. ;(
I dnt get why samsung are playing like this ... They are always keeping ppl in a disadvantage. This mobile is good enugh in many ways bt the camera is low and no flash...y lyk this. Unfair
ICS with 850 MHz processor.. hmm.. hmm.. samsung try hard to keep #1 best seller phone in the world.. they forget ICS with 850 MHz will same like run windows seven in old single core pc processor.. it might be run, but very slow.
The forget they already release galaxy pro b7510 with 800 MHz processor run of froyo.. same resolution, same colour, just different in screen size. galaxy pro run slow.. how about this? ICS with 850 MHz processor?
epic fail samsung.. unless the price is under U$ 100, the slow will be tolerable because of the price.
Anonymous, 05 Jul 2012Chat = Skype, KakaoTalk, Yahoo Messenger, or Tango. Without a secondary camera (video chat) th... morevery true....flop...infact i hate samsung androids.....sony/htc are far better...
Never understood the need for a standard keyboard when there is already a touchscreen keyboard far better...
But that is why Samsung is number 1, giving people so much choice.
if ics is compatible with galaxy chat then why doesn't galaxy Y have an update??? they almost have the same specifications.... unfair
After looking at this,I DEMAND official ICS for my i9000 Samsung!
just thing with galaxy s3,note ,s2 itself is a plastic body then this phone is paper .....!!!weak battery and processor for ics , mine moto fire xt311 is best in comparision.!!
I think the only reason Samsung Chat may support ICS, is because of the crappy resolution, it's about at least 4 times less demanding that the resolution of SGS2. And i think its a capped version of ICS too.
Chat = Skype, KakaoTalk, Yahoo Messenger, or Tango. Without a secondary camera (video chat) the phone is useless -- in my opinion.
AnonD-38544, 04 Jul 2012Yeeees, but Galaxy S+ is too weak for ICS + TouchWiz... Pure hypocrisy...galaxy s+ already has ics
Finally something different from Samsung. It's expected to attract the business class, and the young. I hope Samsung are able to deliver the convenience / robustness that frustrated consumers of Blackberry are seeking.
AnonD-38544, 04 Jul 2012Yeeees, but Galaxy S+ is too weak for ICS + TouchWiz... Pure hypocrisy...i dont think so