Samsung Galaxy Core Advance - user opinions and reviews

• Your Begum Ji
• t1$
• 16 Dec 2013

go to hell this specification ...

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• mani
• Y}K
• 16 Dec 2013

samsung would request you to loungh new series and with latest model of handsets

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• AnonD-214733
• n2K
• 16 Dec 2013

Dual-core is old now. Samsung should focus on quad-core and octa-core only. Front camera is VGA. Atleast 1 megapixel is required.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• AnonD-214733
• n2K
• 16 Dec 2013

Dual-core is old now. Samsung should focus on quad-core and octa-core only. Front camera is VGA. Atleast 1 megapixel is required.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• AnonD-59610
• vbx
• 16 Dec 2013

bullshit fone, even old java fones had better specs than it.. it should be named SAMSUNG GALAXY CORE "SUCKER"

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Anonymous
• mnB
• 16 Dec 2013

Samsung have left with only cores, nothing new.samsung is now becoming a piece of shit boring day by day.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Popy
• vGm
• 16 Dec 2013

Ha ha ha ha...thats very funny ratings given by GSM arena for this phone. I can score more marks by giving blank paper in exams. lol way to go samsung

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• AnonD-141585
• YTc
• 16 Dec 2013

Samsung ready too for core 2 is this a joke going on nothing new and attrective body

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Anonymous
• XMp
• 16 Dec 2013

AnonD-213122, 16 Dec 2013okay..... so whats next? galaxy ace zoom?its not something impossible

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• AnonD-213122
• Kg}
• 16 Dec 2013

okay..... so whats next? galaxy ace zoom?

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Anonymous
• XMp
• 16 Dec 2013

the feature almost identical to Lumia 625..

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• AnonD-201106
• fXD
• 16 Dec 2013

Samsung repeated frequently, nothing new

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• AnonD-92238
• t1$
• 16 Dec 2013

....the original core wasn't much attractive nor this one.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report