shivam, 12 Aug 2014wourst mobile!!!!!!!!! i took it just 3 days back, and it is not working iit is deadPlz guys any1 tell me how to remove its double lock while calling
AnonD-288172, 21 Aug 2014Only 13387 benchmark score for a quadcore cpu!!!!core 2 is not good enough. ..I saw the moto G... moremoto g has very high sar value which responsible for head pain....and feel it too from last month....so plz ignore high sar value phonesss.
AnonD-288172, 21 Aug 2014I dont know how can you say "Core 2 is a very budget phone with good performance availabl... moreMoto G is available only at flipkart.It has no SD card
slot and above all, the poor after sales service of Motorola.
I purchased this phone on 19/08/14.i would like to tell the pros and cons i have experienced do far.1.battery is good 2.camera is nice and the device is very fast3.wifi is damn fast Cons: 1.The only cons is that it doesnt have snapdragon (but it doesnt feel like tat)
I've seen many reviews for core 2 and I can say that dis device has a garbage processor cuz it's chinese and cheap(allwinner 10)and it lags in subway serfers often and asphalt 8 much obviously..duos 2 and ace 3 duos are way waaaaay better than dis device in everything except the screen size and design
Anonymous, 19 Aug 2014this mobile have any hanging power please tell me bc's i buy earlyyah because of low ram
guyyyyyyyyyyyyz,,plz tell me which is better ace 3 duos or core 2 duos cuz um sooo confused between them and th e s duos 2 speakers quality is bad ,,anyone here???????
Guys think 1000 times before buy
1) Poor display clarity
2) Poor viewing angles
3) Average camera
4) No music player application
5) No Proximity sensor
6) Huge price (12000)
Even Galaxy S Duos 2 much better than this phone.
AnonD-288172, 21 Aug 2014I dont know how can you say "Core 2 is a very budget phone with good performance availabl... moreChecked it myself. Compared it with moto g. The very first difference that can be felt easily is screen quality. Non comparable screens at all. Screen quality of core two lacks way too behind or you can say moto g has much better screen quality for its range of phones. Other differences are not quite visible but a person who will use this phone for a month and then a better device then only he/she can feel difference but still if some guys want to stick to this phone only then they can be patient and wait for at least one more month because there is expected a sudden price drop as all of its competitors are pushing it behind in features. So be patient if you want value for money.
someone, please give a link to the pictures you take using this phone. I want to buy this phone if it has a good camera.
AnonD-271442, 20 Aug 2014Find my score image here:
Generally the performance a... moreOnly 13387 benchmark score for a quadcore cpu!!!!core 2 is not good enough. ..I saw the moto G score...it is 17401...moto g 16 gb version is now available at 11999 rupees only
Anyway, I suggest u to install some more apps and some heavy games in core2 and let us know the performance
AnonD-267020, 21 Aug 2014Core 2 is a very budget phone with good performance available for comparison to other brands p... moreI dont know how can you say "Core 2 is a very budget phone with good performance available for comparison to other brands phone ."....becoz core2 is not up to mark...I am not going to say that core2 is worst mobile...it is good...but not good enough to compete with its powerful rival MOTO G...we all know that Moto G is occupying the first position in all smartphone review websites..and moto G is really the number 1 with some outstanding features and premium hardwares.but galaxy core 2 lack many important features like proximity sensor, keypad light, hd playback and recording, IPS display, sufficient ram, sufficient internal storage....and also the hardwares of CORE2 are cheap..and price is too high for these features...so , before buying compare moto g and core 2. ..u will know the difference