Samsung Galaxy Grand Neo - user opinions and reviews

• elsee
• vaN
• 08 Jan 2014

Too expensive for a very simple upgrade

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• AnonD-149767
• PdL
• 08 Jan 2014

Only difference is that its now a quadcore device... From a SOC manufacturer I haven't heard from in a long time.. Broadcomm.... This is a small upgrade over the original grand..

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• AnonD-210852
• vaQ
• 08 Jan 2014

Grand Duos is a better choice

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• AnonD-222442
• t1$
• 08 Jan 2014

Samsung will loose its brand value if they launch this device with this spec for that price. Its totally nonsense and stupid.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• AnonD-172592
• B}v
• 08 Jan 2014

samsung back in black.neo very expencive .basic grand was better than neo

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• AnonD-13309
• tev
• 08 Jan 2014

~187 ppi pixel low density,no 4g badddddddddddd

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• AnonD-15868
• PxW
• 08 Jan 2014

why the samsung again & again making the same crap....

• Rating1 |
• Reply
• Report

• AnonD-222353
• 2ZY
• 08 Jan 2014

[deleted post]You are big Spam in this earth.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• AnonD-222353
• 2ZY
• 08 Jan 2014

Very low ppi.
Very bad phone.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Anonymous
• vbU
• 08 Jan 2014

specs of galaxy grand neo is same like galaxy grand...same screen ppi internal memory only 5 mp camera instead of 8 mp and video recording is 720 instead of 1080 p....price above 20000 is not worth.....

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• oktav
• vfx
• 08 Jan 2014

Another spam zzz wvga for 5inch screen

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• siren
• uut
• 08 Jan 2014

Why is samsung putting old material n making new phones with same design....not worth it.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report