Super smartphone.... no heating problem... no hang..
great battery life up to 2 days... best under 20000.... l am using from 13th of this month... amazing....
Anonymous, 25 Oct 2014and you say samsung only earns profit ..sony htc phones are more expensive than samsung if th... moredon't tell sony is earning or cheating.no one will not accept. sony gives best quality.compare camera and music quality.even sony tipo mobile gives best quality than galaxy phones.
Bijo, 25 Oct 2014Its the biggest mistake I hv done by purchasing this phone. If u hv this phone, u need not t... moreyes u r right it has heating problem while calling or using phone more than 15 min....???
K, 25 Oct 2014so u r telling other company dont earn profit just do some research before telling me...see so... moreAnd one important thing sony is always better in giving updates.it gives updates to its midrange (only xperia c exception).
While samsung never gives any single update to its mid and low range. (Grand1, grand2, mega, ace plus are only exception and they also got only one update) galaxy y, s, s duos1, s duos2, core, core2, ace, ace2, s plus, grand neo and there are many more who never got any update in their life. While sony has given kitkat upate to its 8k device xperia e1.
You samsung buyers must think why samsung is doing this?
K, 25 Oct 2014so u r telling other company dont earn profit just do some research before telling me...see so... moreSamsung is no 1 because of modern marketing only and not because of quality.there are case studies for marketing management on it.you can search it on internet.also you can search reviews of business experts on it all are saying samsung is no 1 because of marketing only otherwise there is no need to overspend on marketing. Its like bollywood movies do lot of advertising even if film is not good it earns enough amount of profit.
K, 25 Oct 2014so u r telling other company dont earn profit just do some research before telling me...see so... moreFirst no one is saying karbon, micromax better than samsung.
Second z2 is not overpriced it is launched in competition with s5. Both are available for 35k.in fact z2 has 3gb ram compared to 2gb of s5. Also z2 have better camera. Z3 and note4boboth are overpriced. Sony was overpriced before 5yrs.now to remain in competition they have reduced their prices a lot.they gives nfc, otg, scratch resistant glass, , mattefinish body, better look, , more resolution camera amd many more in the same price range of samsung. Youu hhave a misconception that sony is overpriced and samsung is cheaper. All information I have given is 100 % true. Do some research and think little outside samsung. By looking at todays scenario sony looks cheaper than samsung because it gives more features, better display, better built quality, better look in the same price range.
Anonymous, 25 Oct 2014and you say samsung only earns profit ..sony htc phones are more expensive than samsung if th... moreT3 is launched in competition with s5 mini.t3 price 24k, s5 mini's price 27k.t3 have bigger screen while s5 mini have 1.5 lpddr2 ram. But t3 have lpddr3 ram. 1 gb lpddr3 ram of t3 is is better than lpddr2 of s5 mini. Thats why in all benchmark tests t3 is better performer. Sony gives much better features and build quality in the same price range than samsung. Sony use lpddr3 ram in all midrange while samsung use lpddr2 in their mid range.sony phones are not at all overpriced now a days. Sony brings every mobile in competition with Samsung with same price and better build quality and look.
Anonymous, 25 Oct 2014Price wise galaxy prime
Other wise both are awesomeI have Grand 2 and it is very good.
But cameras are better on Grand Prime and size is smaller than Grand 2, so it is easier to handle.
Same price, so Grand Prime is definitely a better choice than Grand 2
Fonefreak, 25 Oct 2014Which according to you guys is a better phone: Galaxy Grand 2 or Galaxy Grand Prime?Price wise galaxy prime
Other wise both are awesome
Anonymous, 25 Oct 2014dont give excuse sammy want to earn more profit by fooling customers so not gives many feature... moreand you say samsung only earns profit ..sony htc phones are more expensive than samsung if they dont spend on advertising then also they charges high just see T3 C3 specs even there cost looks like 17k but prices are 27k and 23k...sony always cheat people thats why only they are failed in mid ranger....htc mobiles are also overpriced ....all company do marketing not only Samsung
Its the biggest mistake I hv done by purchasing this phone. If u hv this phone, u need not to hv a room heater. If u speak or use internet for 10-15 minutes its heating like anything. U will not be able to hold even. I don't know anybody else hv the same problem. Batteray back up is good, but take almost 3 hrs to recharge fully. Browsing and intèrnet speed is also good. But display is very poor in daylight. It's really sleek and handy.
Anonymous, 25 Oct 2014dont give excuse sammy want to earn more profit by fooling customers so not gives many feature... moreso u r telling other company dont earn profit just do some research before telling me...see sony xperia Z2 & Z3 both have same type of specs some changes done and price is 50K and above...sony is also making profit by cheating people...even micromax karbonn xolo lava give good specs and after buying customer cry because they are not giving good services and minor problem they solved after 2-3 months..simply dont blame samsung...samsung is no 1 brand it gives good services and even im using samsung phones from 3 yrs ...so simply dont say samsung advertise all company advertise their new launch product...simply do research