This is simply a crappier version of the 4yr old Samsung i9100. Only advantage is energy efficiency of the A7 cores. But the size, display, graphical performance, camera, RAM, storage, it's all worse...
Anonymous, 05 Feb 2015good budget phonegood ph. bt its low ram only 512mb. so its should be price 6400rs . .if more then 8000 it will be most over price ph and flop also. 6400 i h0pe
samsung phone are good but please change the user interface ,looking bad icons
Samsung going to launch J3 J5 J7 in this this line up. These device may launch in upcoming months
God you ppl make me laugh,how on earth can you be interested in a phone thats advertised as 500mgb of ram!you will only get about 287 if your lucky! You buy it then few weeks down the line you be back in here slaiting it.its 2015 ppl for christ sake,save up your money and get something decent !
This is probably galaxy star 3. Btw, they only coded this phone as J1. I like the back cover and the side though. Finally they get rid of that silver thing on the side that peeled off easily.
Shit !!!! Again same phone with low ram , hang problem surely occur . Samsung provides best phones over 12000₹ below it , all are waste phones... I will never suggest u to buy ..
it is similar to Galaxy S GT-i9000 but even without corning glass , hehe yeah I forgot it is kitkat dual core wooooooow !
ya good phone of samsung galxy ji but RAM is very law and that the price very high so andy idea price will be reduce of this phone
Hi,dear friends.I am sorry to write this about the uncle Samsung newly made product!!!Except android kit kat,nothing new or innovative to talk about!The repetition of many recently made redundant products!!!?Costumers expectations from uncle Samsung!?Better not identical similar redundant products with the new names and operating system!!!?A new name for the galaxy star 2 43 inches advance!?Thanks all plus factwriting and publishing GSMarena.Justice Rights.No to last Nokia,s road!