DRACO, 05 Jul 2017you can watch the video of j3 2017 (unboxing) in youtube and it said that its NON-REMOVABLE BATTERYum ok ? lol they already said in the specs at the bottom theres a non removable 2400 battery its said that since they posted
AnonD-682012, 04 Jul 2017I thought it was a removable battery then suddenly it change in non-removable battery!! what ... moreyou can watch the video of j3 2017 (unboxing) in youtube and it said that its NON-REMOVABLE BATTERY
J5 2015 had a 5" screen and a 2600mah battery and the thickness was 7.9mm.
This has the same size display, 8.2" thickness and a smaller battery, 2400mah. I though it might be a very long lasting phone with this thickness packing a 28-2900mah battery, but nah, this is a Samsung budget phone.
I thought it was a removable battery then suddenly it change in non-removable battery!! what is the real specs of battery in this samsung galaxy J3 2017? I really like removable battery for samsung galaxy j3 2017. kindly tell us what is the real specs of battery of samsung galaxy j3 2017.
If in ₹6000 i am getting 4000mah battery+snapdragon 435+2gb ram+16gb internal ....why should i buy samsung....j3 (2017). Samsung must increase the battery at-least 4000mah most important one...
You must decrease the price of phone and must and should specifications also be improved
For that price ? 220 budget smartphone? I remember when flagship was for 350...Now good value to price have only moto g series, maybe lg and xiaomi phones Never again Samsung Or Sony etc
i am waiting this phone it's have nice specification this budgut smartphone.& nice android vergin 7.0 very good smartphone
AnonD-675173, 06 Jun 2017I don't understand why others wants a flagship phone specs for a cheap phone.I expected for it many time Samsung Galaxy j3.
Betry will 3500 mah & new vversion found
Price is under 8000/9000 all people patches 100 present first I
Anonymous, 09 Jun 2017J5 + octa core + bigger battery + fingerprint reader (j3 probably won't have this) + dua... moreI still think the j3 is a better buy because the j5 priced is just unacceptable because you can get so many much much better phones for the priced.. moto 5,,,Huawei..... etc.
those who have any doubts about my comment can go and check gsmarena battery review of galaxy A3 2017 ..
93h endurance with 15-16h browsing and video playback .. on the same 2400 mah battery .. that is with an octa core.. just screen size is 4.7 inch vs 5 inch here , so this j3 2017 expect 90h and 14h browsing and video playback..
Ayoub Elhannouni, 08 Jun 2017Nice Phone , But The Battery Is Still Little Bit Bad , But The Price Is Very Very Bad , More T... moreactually battery backup of this phone is going to be its major feature and usp ..
even though battery is only 2400mah the processor used in it is built on 14nm node . which is very very very effecient..
expect 90h+ endurance rating and 14h web browsing gsmarena rating..
Anonymous, 08 Jun 2017I think the j3 is much better buy compared to the j5! I don't know what Samsung is thinking bo... moreJ5
+ octa core
+ bigger battery
+ fingerprint reader (j3 probably won't have this)
+ dual band ac wifi (j3 might have this)
+ slightly bigger screen/better screen to body ratio/better design
- No front flash
- Non removable battery
- slightly lower dpi
Worth the 60 dollar difference? I think they're both overpriced btw.
Anonymous, 08 Jun 2017Exynos 7870 Octa vs Quadjust for octa core it's priced is unacceptable.. if the j5 would have 3gb ram than it's OK. Samsung is flooding the smartphone market again