The Samsung Galaxy S5 is based on a Qualcomm Snapdragon 801 chipset (MSM8974AC). Some clarification is due since not all 801 chipsets are created equal. The MSM8974 is the base Snapdragon 800 chipset, while MSM8974AB overclocks the GPU and gets the Snapdragon 801 badge.
The MSM8974AC goes a step further and clocks the CPU higher too. Also worth pointing out, on the KitKat software, Samsung has removed the benchmark detection and overclocking, so if the Galaxy S5 doesn't trounce the Galaxy Note 3 it's because it's showing real performance.
Surprisingly, Benchmark Pi isn't showing much difference between the Galaxy S4 and S5. We'll chalk this off to the benchmark being old as Linpack and Geekbench 3 show a definite improvement. Geekbench in particular puts the Galaxy S5 on top, while Linpack places it within a percent of Snapdragon 800 devices (some of which may have been engaged in benchmark-specific overclocking).
Update: We re-ran some benchmarks after the Galaxy S5 was updated to Android 5.0 Lollipop. You can find more details here.
Benchmark Pi
Lower is better
LG G Flex 99
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 99
LG G2 99
Sony Xperia Z1 Compact 104
Sony Xperia Z1 115
Sony Xperia Z Ultra 115
HTC One (M8) 121
Samsung Galaxy S5 128
HTC One Max 131
Samsung Galaxy S4 (Octa) 132
Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600) 132
LG G Pro 2 141
LG Nexus 5 146
HTC One 151
Samsung Galaxy S4 mini 166
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Neo 183
Linpack
Higher is better
LG G Flex 1102
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 1081
LG G2 1054
Sony Xperia Z Ultra 1034
Sony Xperia Z1 Compact 1010
Sony Xperia Z1 1004
Samsung Galaxy S5 992
HTC One (M8) 992
LG G Pro 2 818
Samsung Galaxy S4 (Octa) 791
Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600) 788
LG Optimus G Pro 743
HTC One 646
Samsung Galaxy S4 mini 413
LG Nexus 5 393
Geekbench 3
Higher is better
Samsung Galaxy S5 (Lollipop) 3120
Samsung Galaxy S5 3011
Sony Xperia Z1 Compact 2968
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 2937
Sony Xperia Z Ultra 2670
Sony Xperia Z1 2638
LG G Pro 2 2585
Apple iPhone 5s 2561
LG Nexus 5 2453
HTC One (M8) 2367
LG G Flex 2254
LG G2 2243
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Neo 2172
HTC One 1972
Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600) 1869
We also traditionally put the reviewed phones through the Basemark OS II. Rightware distributes anti-cheat versions of their popular Basemark OS II (for general performance) and Basemark X (for 3D performance) tests. We've run both version and we found Samsung Galaxy S5 scores equally, which means the company isn't using any tricks to boost the benchmarks' overall performance.
Basemark OS II
Higher is better
Oppo Find 7 1212
OnePlus One 1196
LG G3 16GB (2GB RAM, int'l) 1151
Samsung Galaxy S5 (Lollipop) 1147
HTC One (M8) 1126
Samsung Galaxy S5 1082
Sony Xperia Z2 1080
Oppo Find 7a 1057
Basemark OS II (single-core)
Higher is better
Oppo Find 7 2606
Oppo Find 7a 2580
Samsung Galaxy S5 (Lollipop) 2510
HTC One (M8) 2428
Samsung Galaxy S5 2415
Sony Xperia Z2 2253
OnePlus One 2213
LG G3 16GB (2GB RAM, int'l) 2137
Basemark OS II (multi-core)
Higher is better
Oppo Find 7 10391
Oppo Find 7a 10256
OnePlus One 10234
Samsung Galaxy S5 10063
Sony Xperia Z2 10044
LG G3 16GB (2GB RAM, int'l) 9937
HTC One (M8) 9860
Samsung Galaxy S5 (Lollipop) 9646
Compound benchmarks - Quadrant and AnTuTu 4 - show more confidence in Galaxy S5. Quadrant gives Samsung's new flagship a huge advantage over the S800 competition, and virtually on par with the HTC One (M8).
Quadrant
Higher is better
Samsung Galaxy S5 25044
HTC One (M8) 25035
Sony Xperia Z1 Compact 21618
LG G Flex 20521
Sony Xperia Z1 20388
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 20052
LG G Pro 2 20010
LG G2 19815
Sony Xperia Z Ultra 18177
Samsung Galaxy S4 (Octa) 12446
Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600) 12376
LG Optimus G Pro 12105
HTC One 11746
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Neo 11404
LG Nexus 5 8844
Samsung Galaxy S4 mini 7153
AnTuTu 4
Higher is better
HTC One (M8) 37009
Samsung Galaxy S5 36018
LG G Flex 35831
LG G2 35444
Sony Xperia Z1 Compact 34527
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Neo 32162
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 31109
Sony Xperia Z1 30850
LG G Pro 2 29603
Sony Xperia Z Ultra 29185
Samsung Galaxy S4 27613
HTC One 26389
LG Nexus 5 25097
When it comes to offscreen benchmarks, the High clock speed of the new Adreno 330 easily pushes it on top, but screen resolution has to be taken into account.
GFX Benchmark 2.7 T-Rex (1080p off-screen)
Higher is better
HTC One (M8) 28.4
Samsung Galaxy S5 27.8
Samsung Galaxy S5 (Lollipop) 27
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 26.3
LG Nexus 5 23
Sony Xperia Z1 23
Sony Xperia Z Ultra 23
Apple iPhone 5s 23
LG G Pro 2 22.9
Sony Xperia Z1 Compact 22
LG G Flex 22
LG G2 22
Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600) 17.1
Samsung Galaxy S4 (Octa) 17.1
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Neo 15
Samsung Galaxy S4 mini 6.4
GFX Benchmark 3.0 Manhattan (1080p off-screen)
Higher is better
Samsung Galaxy S5 (Lollipop) 12
Samsung Galaxy S5 11.8
HTC One (M8) 11.1
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 9.9
Sony Xperia Z1 Compact 9
LG G Pro 2 8.7
LG Nexus 5 8.5
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Neo 3.7
Samsung Galaxy Grand 2 1.9
Lower resolution phones (720p or so) like the Xperia Z1 Compact and iPhone 5s climb on top, but as far as 1080p devices go, the Galaxy S5 is only matched by the HTC One (M8) on the GFXBench suite. Epic Citadel places it a bit lower though it's within a couple of percent.
GFX Benchmark 2.7 T-Rex (1080p on-screen)
Higher is better
Apple iPhone 5s 37
Sony Xperia Z1 Compact 34
LG G Flex 33
HTC One (M8) 30.1
Samsung Galaxy S5 28.1
Samsung Galaxy S5 (Lollipop) 28
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 26.7
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Neo 25
LG G Pro 2 24.1
LG Nexus 5 24
LG G2 23.1
GFX Benchmark 3.0 Manhattan (1080p on-screen)
Higher is better
Samsung Galaxy S5 (Lollipop) 12
HTC One (M8) 11.9
Samsung Galaxy S5 11.7
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 10
LG G Pro 2 9.2
Samsung Galaxy Tab Pro 8.4 5
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Neo 4.7
Epic Citadel
Higher is better
HTC One (M8) 59
LG G Flex 56
Sony Xperia Z 55.6
Sony Xperia Z1 54.8
LG G Pro 2 54.1
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 54
Samsung Galaxy S5 53.7
LG Nexus 5 49.1
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Neo 49
Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600) 37.2
Samsung Galaxy Grand 2 32
Samsung tweaked the stock Android browser, which clearly shows in the web benchmarks. The Samsung Galaxy S5 trades blows with the Apple iPhone 5s. Apple's iDevices have long set the standard in web performance, but screen resolution plays a role in BrowserMark 2 as the Galaxy S5 renders pages at over twice the resolution.
SunSpider
Lower is better
Samsung Galaxy S5 379
Apple iPhone 5s 403
LG G Pro 2 535.5
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Neo 567.9
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 587
Sony Xperia Z Ultra 750
HTC One (M8) 780
LG Nexus 5 827
Sony Xperia Z1 845
Sony Xperia Z1 Compact 855
LG G2 908
Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600) 1046
HTC One 1174
BrowserMark 2
Higher is better
Apple iPhone 5s 3549
Samsung Galaxy S5 3529
HTC One (M8) 3213
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 Neo 3172
LG G Pro 2 3048
Samsung Galaxy Note 3 3041
LG Nexus 5 2745
LG G2 2718
Sony Xperia Z1 Compact 2600
Samsung Galaxy S4 (S600) 2438
Sony Xperia Z Ultra 2419
Sony Xperia Z1 2398
Samsung Galaxy S4 mini 2314
HTC One 2262
So, is the new chipset worth it over the Galaxy S4 chipset? The Galaxy S5 is indeed faster than its predecessor in all relevant areas. Gaming performance is the headlining change here - the new phone offers significant advantages over the old one, which will enable more advanced games.
Overall performance has received a boost too, but you might not notice it in general usage where most apps are lightweight and fairly passive (say, a messenger). Still, if you have two heavier apps, the Galaxy S5 will run them side by side with Multi Window without breaking a sweat.
Tip us
1.9m 150k
RSS
EV
Merch
Log in I forgot my password Sign up