Ragul, 08 Apr 2014This plastic medium class phone costs 51,500 rupees? Samsung marketing stupidpersons are incre... moreWell said bro..I guess next year whn they gonna launch galaxy s6 possibly thn Samsung might price 61000 bucks & galaxy s7 72000. The trend goes on.. LOL.. Who will invest above half an lakh rupees jst fr a phone? ??
I really like the fact that it is made in Korea and not elsewhere....
Why did this phone get such low scores in design, features, and performance?? I think it's a great phone.. although I'll be upgrading in July to the LG G3.
Chirag , 07 Apr 2014There is nothing like anyone has copied from each other.every company has to always see what t... moreWho told you that Apple was the first to launch the fingerprint sensor?
Where did you get that lie?
It is not true, Apple just copied from Motorola!
Motorola was the first!
By the way, follow the court case of Apple vs Samsung now. It's interesting, as a lot of secret documents are being released. Apple executives were angry at Samsung's good ads, because Apple execs said 'We have the better product".
Samsung secret documents say, their plan was to do whatever it takes to beat Apple, as "they had the better product".
Do you really need to spell it out anymore? Even both APPLE AND SAMSUNG know who has the better product.
AnonD-250017, 07 Apr 2014LOL.
iPhone 5s is not even comparable to S4. S4 is much much better. To compare with Galaxy ... moreActually, the Galaxy S5 is against the iPhone 5S. Samsung shifted their launch dates to be a few months after iPhone, where they would avoid competing head on in sales, so they chose the period where initial sales of iPhone would taper off.
Anonymous, 07 Apr 2014Apple was not the first. Nokia had that shit for years.I have been a Nokia fan for many years and don't recall seeing any with a finger print sensor. Out of curiosity which Nokia phones had a finger print sensor?
Anonymous, 08 Apr 2014Xperia Z1 compact is still better than this oneRemovable battery is better where Z1 Compact is not.
Snapdragon 801 is better where Z1 Compact is not.
2.5 GHZ is better where Z1 Compact is only 2.2GHz.
5.1" screen is better where Z1 Compact is only 4.3".
432 ppi pixel density is better where Z1 Compact is only 342 ppi pixel density
8.1 mm thin is better where Z1 Compact is 9.5 mm brick!
ok so your waiting for your train, doctors appointment whatever. If your options were listen to your heartbeat for half an hour or NEW music or program on your phone's radio what would you choose?
This plastic medium class phone costs 51,500 rupees? Samsung marketing stupidpersons are increasing nearly 10,000 for each flagships. I hope note 4 will cost above 60,000 rupees and samsung will be bashed out of Indian market. Rude pricing. s4 which originally costs 28000 rupees(current price) was sold at 42000 rupees with no mercy. this phone will surely be a bomb in selling as the note 3 neo did. Samsung, if people buy your products, don't think they are fools.
Anonymous, 08 Apr 2014Xperia Z1 compact is still better than this oneAaaahhh not
No radio? Are you serious? It has a dozen sensors but has no radio?
Anonymous, 07 Apr 2014Apple was not the first. Nokia had that shit for years.Real Talk