[deleted post]You have failed to provide evidence to backup your claims sir, just let it go.
[deleted post]I always tell the truth, the original galaxy yes, but S6 no. funny how you didn't even read the link that original iphone was actually copy of sony and Samsung f700.
[deleted post]Except it isn't, the design is nothing like iphone 6. Also the quality and design are infact better first unbox therapy could not bend note 3. Also check phone arena note 4 based on customer voting design is better than iphone 6. Your argument of it being similar has been proven false. Actually they were better due to the features and super amoled to name a few.
[deleted post]Lets see there is the LG prada and design from sony, so even the original iphone did borrow from other brands.
Here you go sir, Samsung did borrow deisgn queues in first galaxy but that was it.
[deleted post]There is no apple bashing going on sir, no one is getting paid here. I would direct your attention to idc report which you can find via google. Last quarter apple sold 74 million iphones and for the whole year got total of 198 million. In comparison samsung sold 398 million handset, so apple market share did go down last year. Thus no apple didn't get samsung customers to switch. Also you need to provide evidence of others being samsung fan, simply saying they are doesn't make it so sir.
[deleted post]Not really apple doesn't own rounded corners, since other phones had round corners before. The lack of sd card is due to ufs 2.0 being very fast. Many smartphones have non removable battery. Anything else
[deleted post]Also what makes you think I'm fanboy, I only state the truth and nothing else.
glad you asked here you go.
[deleted post]Samsung did utilize fingerprint scanner that requires a touch as compared with swipe before, but since apple didn't make fingerprint scanner there is no copying there.
Please understand you have no logical argument here, it's best to let it go.
[deleted post]Having a fingerprint sensor which utilizes you touch is not copying apple. Furthermore apple did copy andriod with apple pay and nfc xhip. Your argument is invalid and illogical.
[deleted post]please don't insult others, the evidence is there I would suggesting try to keep apple advertising and bashing Samsung to minimum. I also don't require glasses and can see very well, but I guess those who don't agree with your invalid points must be blind. Very interesting logic.
[deleted post]Please do read my earlier comment, the picture you provided shows nothing and we are talking about the back side and corners not the front. Hence proving the undeniable fact that apple did copy galaxy s3, note 3, ativ s , htc m8 and moto atrix
[deleted post]Again apple didn't change anything on the front but the sides and corners are copied from ativ s, once again you have no valid and logical points.
[deleted post]I would not reply to apple fans, but in this case I make an exception. The two links posted one doesn't exist and the second is just some random pictures. With all due respect, you have no argument and 1701 did provide evidence of apple copying and has logical and valid points that cannot be disproved. So it's best to accept the fact of apple copying and simply move on.
[deleted post]Those link don't work and prove nothing please understand apple did copy that design as much as you want to state otherwise.
If you did click on my links the iphone 6 is actually just an iphone 5 with no upgrade, besides copying the back of htc m8 and sides and corners ativ s, size of galaxy s3 and note 3 and finger print scanner copied from moto atrix.
I want this phone too everything in my house is Samsung. Just cant get enough!
shukur, 09 Apr 2015dont teling thet iphone copied samsung or htc,apple have same desing from the first iphone ,do... moreHere we go iphone 6 is actually copy of ativ s.
the s6 is basically an iphone with the android operating system. i have the s5 with an upgraded 8000mah battery due to my usage and a 64gb sd card. not worth downgrading to the s6