AnonD-373771, 03 Apr 2015That was confirmed to be only scratches and hence not an issue, Just false reporting. Indeed n... moreThet I tolking about if you forced to bent it will ,like note 4 whit you hands you can bent
kiki, 03 Apr 2015And the s6 edge have isue whit screen and bilt quality,there are reports about thet on you tub... moreThat was confirmed to be only scratches and hence not an issue, Just false reporting. Indeed note 4 does bend in same spot but needs to be physically bent, unlike iphone 6.
Also he claims iphone 6 bending is false and it doesn't bend. Yes the reports are there iphone 6 plus is prone to accidental bending.
And the s6 edge have isue whit screen and bilt quality,there are reports about thet on you tube,so nobody is perfekt.
AnonD-373771, 03 Apr 2015He/she was stating his iPhone 6 plus bending. Evidence that 6 plus bend is there and it's been... moreI thing a lot of phones can bend,so and note 4 is bending in the same place like 6 plus,also s4(you can brake if you forsed with hands)and sony z can bend ...but thet is if you aplay a lot of presure,in normal use no phone is bending
rock, 03 Apr 2015this videos ar old from 23.9.2014 the phone is 6 monath old, how there is no new video anout b... moreHe/she was stating his iPhone 6 plus bending. Evidence that 6 plus bend is there and it's been proven that iPhone 6 plus does have design flaw and bends with slight pressure. We are trying to keep things civilized, prevent brand bashing. Please stop spreading false information, prove it doesn't bend with a genuine video from a reputable source in front of live audience. Also iPhone is many years behind competition with sub par hardware camera based on phone arena blind test. All the reports of bending come in at the time of release, so don't expect new online valid claims. Please stop trolling, im sure the opinion of people are clear.
AnonD-377331, 03 Apr 2015Also please do provide evidence of your baseless and incorrect claim that iPhone 6 plus doesn'... morethis videos ar old from 23.9.2014 the phone is 6 monath old, how there is no new video anout bending,and on this site only j.wolf and aod coments,how about other opinions?? and pleace dont repli .The same 2 peple coments all the time.They are very good in phones
AnonD-111968, 03 Apr 2015PATHETIC BATTERY LIFE with all the advanced specs, they neglected the most important aspect: b... moreFirst off that was pre-release version, s6 matches S5 in great battery life, and S6 edge matches Note 4 in battery life. Test was done by phone arena, might want to look into it. It should help you obtain correct information. Also iPhone 6 and 6 plus have average battery life at best. Qhd superamoled is more efficient than S5 fullhd.
AnonD-111968, 03 Apr 2015PATHETIC BATTERY LIFE with all the advanced specs, they neglected the most important aspect: b... moreHow could this S6 be on top of daily rating when it's battery life is nothing compared to Note 4 and especially compared to Z3C. USELESS 2015 features has led to a miserable battery life, useless, useless QHD and superthin profile.
AnonD-359663, 03 Apr 2015Quite funny you're trying to get rise out of me, sorry not going to work. You can't simply be ... morePATHETIC BATTERY LIFE with all the advanced specs, they neglected the most important aspect: battery life: S6 browsing time = 8h 44min vs Z3C 15h and endurance rating S6=64h vs Z3C=101h, QHD and 6.9mm are worst FEATURES of S6 and also the pathetic IPHONE6 BATTERY LIFE.
AnonD-359663, 03 Apr 2015Quite funny you're trying to get rise out of me, sorry not going to work. You can't simply be ... moreIt is not a matter of using Wikipedia to show your knowledge! it is a matter of a life-long researching as when a person works with Cadence IC virtuoso and schematic software for 10 years to design electronic devices efficiently based on it`s physical layout and circuit component characteristics!
the new technology that you mentioned doesn't belong to Samsung but to me and enormous number of researchers around the worlds that publish a lot of credible journals and Samsung role is just spending the money at tantalizing us to sell our achievements. Many of my friends worked on the TSMC 14nm package that is essential for pre-designing 14nm chips and the wage was so small! just 10000$ for such a prospering technology. That is the reality of cruel companies!
AnonD-336560, 03 Apr 2015I can not see any sensible response challenging my statement especially regarding battery. You... moreWith all due respects, your knowledge about phone engineering is slacking too.
What about weight added to a phone with a larger battery ? Safety (in case of explosion for example)? Charging time? Average battery usage ratio per day which Samsung surely has surveyed with their autoreports ?
And i'm sure there are many other questions/factors which we all can't think about since none of us is working for them.
So it's cool to try to look smart on a blog, but i would find you way cooler if you had designed the internals of a S6 or any superior phone.
You are trying to make points just to entertain yourself. In the end, we will buy S6 and enjoy it as all MWC visitors did while you'll go on debating about how you are right.
[deleted post]So you insult others and pretty much anyone who doesn't agree with you is illogical, good luck with that mindset.
Also might want to separate out your argument so it's easier to read. Thank you for your comment
AnonD-336560, 03 Apr 2015I can not see any sensible response challenging my statement especially regarding battery. You... moreQuite funny you're trying to get rise out of me, sorry not going to work. You can't simply be more wrong about my response it's actually on point and valid, I did back up what I said. Only if you would please read my post again and do some research.
As a person who claims my knowledge is limited, you have don't know why 14 nm exynos is more energy efficient. Exynos 7420 has reduced size, hence there is smaller distance between transistors which in turn results in better energy efficiency and greater processing power. However there is drawback due to current leakage which is overcome with including thin silicon which encompasses conducting channel.
Also as you claim to be a professional you called the new memory of S6, usb 2.0 instead of UFS 2.0. I'm sure that the innovative S6 battery which charges in mere 78 minutes is cheap. Also 14 nm achievement actually resulted in samsung manufacting them for qualcomm and possibly nvidia.
nick, 03 Apr 2015Lol its true, people are justifing the ridiculous new pricing of a newly dropped galaxy s phon... moreFew issues with your post, technology must evolve and thus faster processors, better screens, memory, batteries are a must for smartphones.
The qhd screen of S6 and S6 edge actually use less power than screen on S5. I'm sure you must know about 14 nm exynos 7420 which is well more power efficient than current snapdragon 810 and new UFS 2.0 memory which consumes less power compared to memory of other smartphones plus faster read and write speeds.
I can tell from first hand experience, try loading a 4k or even full hd file from microsd on S5, it takes quite bit to load certainly longer than it should.
Please don't generalize, did you ask every Samsung user why they choose the galaxy brand. Some like features of touchwiz, some the super amoled screen which is the best screen of any smartphone. It only Takes 78 and 83 minutes to charge S6 and S6 edge respectively.
Display mate already crowned S6 as having the best display among all smartphones. Let me ask you settle for inter core 2 duo when there is core i7 cpu around, this is the same case for exynos 7420.
With regards to qhd display yes you can see the difference, the whole rumour of not being able to see the difference is apple's marketing since they have not yet incorporated that in their handsets (just like apple's stance on larger screen and nfc mobile payments).
Radio can be useful, but that's one feature which was removed from S4 onwards.
Also Z3 compact is great device albeit not being flagship, sony xperia z4 or even lg g4.
AnonD-359663, 03 Apr 2015The memory used is actually ufs 2.0, not usb 2.0. Moving on that is very lengthy post, which m... moreI can not see any sensible response challenging my statement especially regarding battery. Your knowledge about electronic devices as well as OS architecture is very basic and it would be really difficult for you discussing with professionals. However, Concerning energy consuming it is not Samsung`s but electronic industry achievement that led to reducing in power consumption specifically in the code efficiency and semiconductor areas. Meanwhile, Samsung achievement can be summarized as using cheaper battery and selling their internal memories.
AnonD-336560, 03 Apr 2015I aporiciate your loyalty but there are some obvious fallacies in your comment. You mentioned... moreI didn't notice any fallacies, he is on point but your post is very difficult to read, and suggests you're trolling.
AnonD-336560, 03 Apr 2015It is more ridiculously priced! Now remove my comment since I told the truthWell this device is not cheap. But since the use stronger aluminium 6013, best display, camera, memory and processor. The price is justified, I think many will agree with me based on both white and black S6 and S6 edge 128 gb are sold out in my country and 32 , 64 are low on stock. You can check this via visting telstra online store.
AnonD-336560, 03 Apr 2015I aporiciate your loyalty but there are some obvious fallacies in your comment.
You mentioned... moreThe memory used is actually ufs 2.0, not usb 2.0. Moving on that is very lengthy post, which makes no sense. With regards to battery life, I understand you can have your doubts. But might want to check phone arena did a battery life test. S6 has the same battery life as S5 and S6 edge battery life is same as note 4. I'm sure you can do google search for phone arena galaxy s6 edge battery life test.
Would you elaborate on loyalty, in my humble opinion S4 was much better device than S5. However S6 I cannot find any faults in it.
AnonD-359663, 03 Apr 2015Very good question. When manufacturers want to design phone they need to take into account man... moreI aporiciate your loyalty but there are some obvious fallacies in your comment.
You mentioned some reseaons justifying the Samsung battery issue. To my mind however it didn't back up with supporting evidences. Energy consumption and storage is one of the most important areas that has been conducted by almost all prestigious universities' faculty professors and students. This fact covers a wide applications but in Mobile phones it could be a key factor. It is due to the fact that the concept of Energy for mobile phone (as you could infere from the word of "mobile") can be regarded as vital liquid (water) for human since mobile phones don't connect to the infinite source of energy (as human relationship to the water). A prefect Example of this claim is the remarkable attempts of researchers to reduce the energy consumption via electronic circuit as well as algorithm code architecture optimization.
Going on to the next point, regarding to USB 2.0, I think I would say that this technology is not a replacement for SD cards but is an aid for people who are not satisfied with their phones internal+external storage.