Bhabani, 29 Mar 2017I don't like the dimensions. 6.2 inch fone with 78 mm width of a fone. Useless. If u increas... moreSpot on. The width should have been increased proportionately to the height of the phone. They rather end up with a blackberry priv like phone other than a ruler.
Great phones, very poor batteries, they should be 5000, and 6000 respectively.
Looks like a great phone. I had the Galaxy Mega 6.3 and that had a 3200mah battery. It lasted me all day no problem. This phone had a bigger battery, slightly smaller but more efficient display, better chipset, more efficient OS and no doubt better RAM management so it will have brilliant battery life.
Razmuz, 29 Mar 2017Med exynos in Europe hehe joke?Not good.I buy sony xperia xz premium.I am also getting Sony Xz
Med exynos in Europe hehe joke?Not good.I buy sony xperia xz premium.
for 5.8(inches) screen 3000 MAH battery is less(better to keep power bank)it should be at least 4000 MAH battery ...
Apart from S8 is only bigger with a 500 mAh extra in battery rest is same.
Anyway put 100 eur for a 0,4 inch bigger screen is like first april joke.
From previous S7 and S7 edge it have nothing special just a little bit better processor and is much more expensive.
Anyway bad battery no 6gb ram or better no dedicated sim slot and SD card slot for dual sim.
This phone have nothing of my interest.
Like Samsung Note 7 this one is really Really REALLY ONE BIG MISTAKE AND FAILURE.
Definitely not worth to buy even for Samsung hard rock fans.
I don't like the dimensions. 6.2 inch fone with 78 mm width of a fone. Useless. If u increase the display size , increase width. Don't make a school ruler shaped fone.
With exactly half the price and 6GB RAM isn't one plus3 a better bet ? I think anyday. I have been using it since its launch in June 2016 and not once has it hanged or had a lag time. People are amazed when I flip through the pics ( nearly 32000 pics) in my phone : They just keep opening without any delay in loading. Am in a business where I get maybe 400-500 pics everyday and I have to save a lot of them ...
Samsung has its own plus points but considering that we do not use a phone for more than an year or max 1.5...outside chance of carrying it for two years I think Samsung phones are expensive.
Samsung_fan88, 28 Mar 2017Wrong, the other colours will be present from front to back. check on google at the leaks of... moreWell, well, well....look at that. Gsma already changed the profile picture of S8+ to all black. You were saying?
Anonymous, 25 Mar 2017I think its time for GSMA to change the profile photo of S8+ again. There no such thing as col... moreWrong, the other colours will be present from front to back.
check on google at the leaks of the white galaxy s8 you will see.
RB.19, 26 Mar 2017But not super sexy in a price. Its 900 euro my friend. Its a lot. ( come on SAMSUNG, its to high)price in my country minimum 1200eur
MrPerfect, 18 Mar 2017super sexy design in gold colourBut not super sexy in a price. Its 900 euro my friend. Its a lot. ( come on SAMSUNG, its to high)
I think its time for GSMA to change the profile photo of S8+ again. There no such thing as colored front. It will be black regardless of color.
I would like to see Samsung making some devices with optical zoom too. Seriously, we are in 2017, if we are going back one decade we will meet with the Nokia N93 and some others which had optical zoom! Yes, I know those where bulky, but 10 years have passed since then! If we go back 3 years, we will see the 10 x optical zoom S4 Zoom. That was bulky, but we we got 10 x optical zoom. They should make a much thinner phone with 4 x optical zoom. I am sure this is possible.