Am I the only one hoping either an upgraded camera or a dual back module?
Anonymous, 05 Mar 2017Hands down the ugliest smartphone of 2017 with zero innovation!, nuff said.Hahaha nice joke.
Anonymous, 05 Mar 2017Hands down the ugliest smartphone of 2017 with zero innovation!, nuff said.Says the apple fan boy..rocking tech from 2007
Bukhari, 05 Mar 2017how you can have s8 even its announcement of release is on 29 march, 2017 Can't you see? It's part of the RUMOR MILL section here. Wew
Hands down the ugliest smartphone of 2017 with zero innovation!, nuff said.
I have an S8 and I really appreciate it's battery, I am extremely dissatisfied on the S8+ , because it's bigger, yet has a smaller battery, the 835 could be more energy efficient, but it know has a bigger screen to feed, so overall it's a downgrade (and when I company claims energy efficiency, they calculate it on a standard task, without considering that the new chip has extra power, that will consume extra energy on demanding tasks, the battery will rank a 70+ hours for the S8 and 80+ for the S8+,a long way till the nearly 100hs the S7 edge had)... A couple of mm thicker wouldn't hurt anyone, apart from the iPhone junkies, who believe that 7.9 is final frontier for premium phones...
but why it is not note 8 , samsung made s8 which is enough the next big deal should be
note 8 as both phones s8 and s8+ are idiotically with the exception on screen size
S8+ will have battery issues that's my expectation, better wait and see what the user is saying once it is released.
I was really expecting a internal memory of 256GB its a real bummer dat it has only 128 Gb
Different screen aspect ratio than the S8 (1440x2560 px. vs. 1440x2960 px.)?
I suposse is 1440x2560 px. because is 16:9.
qasim umer saddal, 26 Feb 2017make 16m caamera 12m is very low
12 is just fine megapixels dont matter
4000 pixels wide and 3000 pixels tall is a 12 megapixel photo that more than enough
megapixels don't matter
the battery is fine because the snapdragon 835 is good at saving battery