All the Android phone manufacturers seem to follow this herd mentality. The specs of all the flagships look very similar to each other, screen size of 4.6" to 4.8", similar quad core processors (except Sony who is stuck at dual core), same camera specs of 8 mpx (with a few exceptions)...
And then there is the mid market phones with single/dual core processors, 4 inch VGA screen and 5 mps camera.
Yaaawwnnn... No one tries to innovate anymore.
This phone has the potential to break that mold but Samsung decided to stick to the herd.
It is time someone realized not everyone who wants a small phone wants a low budget one. So stop making the smaller phones fat, slow and with outdated technology. How about making a really slim (8mm) phone with a HD 4" screen, 8 mpx camera and decent processor ?
with that specs i might as well buy an SGS2 or an Atrix, almost same specs for virtually half the price LOL
Droid Terminator, 12 Oct 2012Oh man! Why are you trying to defend this overprice phone. This phone doesn't deserved to be c... moreThe Razr M isn't a Mini version. I would like to see the Razr M Mini's specs when if will ever come. What do you want from a Mini phone? Mini version are supposed to not be high-end, so this is meant to be a cheaper version of the GS3. Anyway, Samsung made a mistake with it's price.
This fone is going to made a big hits.
inspite of its inferior software quality with the big title gs3.... series.
What, is Samsung hoping the average consumer will not compare the specs to the S III? And thus the buyer imagines their holding a model akin to the S III but smaller? Clever marketing, to be sure. But what a risk; and, in my opinion, somewhat deceptive. With this move I have lost a bit of respect for Samsung. I would choose the Galaxy S II. And it can be found for a lower price!
usmanjavid, 12 Oct 2012oh man price look to much high xperia p and htc one s or galaxy s duos are better choice in th... morelol my samsung galaxy s 3 is almost 80000 pakistani so this must be a bit higher cost then mine cox it is lastest
I once again repeat that every new model is inferior than previous model and having high price. Samsung has started profit making but Samsung should know that still it is not enjoying that brand value as the Nokia. It will fall down soon if not improve itself.
perfect midranger!!! i was waiting for this kind of model. I'll buy this if i get it below 20000 INR after 6 months. till than i m happy with my XPERIA neo-V.
these specifications are just for an ordinary phone..
Nothing in particular.. we expect a lot wen its sg3.
but not close..
if the price was less i mean much less then ther wudnt b much of an issue
Galaxy SIII mini = Galaxy S advance + extra 256MB ram + extra 90 Euro
Should we pay extra 90 Euro just for extra 256MB ram???
no single thing is SIII in this 'mini' version. just the design, which is btw ugly! LOL. stupid Samsung. even S2 is better. and this is more expensive! ugly screen, no LTE, dual core 1GHz, 5MP cam, 1500mAh battery. everything is cheap!!! inside the ever so cheap build quality! can samsung be cheaper than this? the only great thing is JB! this should be named galaxy s1.1 LOLOLOL! stupid!