perfect midranger!!! i was waiting for this kind of model. I'll buy this if i get it below 20000 INR after 6 months. till than i m happy with my XPERIA neo-V.
these specifications are just for an ordinary phone..
Nothing in particular.. we expect a lot wen its sg3.
but not close..
if the price was less i mean much less then ther wudnt b much of an issue
Galaxy SIII mini = Galaxy S advance + extra 256MB ram + extra 90 Euro
Should we pay extra 90 Euro just for extra 256MB ram???
no single thing is SIII in this 'mini' version. just the design, which is btw ugly! LOL. stupid Samsung. even S2 is better. and this is more expensive! ugly screen, no LTE, dual core 1GHz, 5MP cam, 1500mAh battery. everything is cheap!!! inside the ever so cheap build quality! can samsung be cheaper than this? the only great thing is JB! this should be named galaxy s1.1 LOLOLOL! stupid!
Just compare it with S Advance.. waw.. it's quite similar.. and S Adv even has better secondary camera.. and the bulky rounded edges looks less pro than S Advance (which has SII similar looks).. I'm more satisfied now with S Adv in my hand.. :)
Galaxy S3 mini is Overpriced, samsung cheating publics with the name gs3.
One could easily purchased high end LG Optimus 4X HD with quad core, 4.7" HD, gorilla glass screen, twice superior processor at the same price.
Still the Galaxy SII is better. There are no unique features in this so called S III mini to outclass other phones in similar range.
samsung are not stupid, they know people will compare this to the sgs2 thus possibly boosting sgs2 sales again, very clever.
Mobilemaster, 12 Oct 2012This isn't a high-end phone ok???Oh man! Why are you trying to defend this overprice phone. This phone doesn't deserved to be call GS3 Mini with this low spec.
Razr I or Razr M all the way.
AnonD-44103, 12 Oct 2012oh man price look to much high xperia p and htc one s or galaxy s duos are better choice in th... moreWith that price; even Galaxy S II is a better choice :s At least it has a regular RGB pixel matrix and a slightly better screen..And probably much better graphics, and of course way better camera and video quality..
lol@samsung..wat d heck did u make..samsung jst spoilt their market wt dis crap..samsung are nt mearnt 2 name dis s3 mini..ma galaxy ace 2 z beta..no gpu..no good front camera..5mp z outdated..nd price 2 high..same price wt s2..which has more beta specs dat dis rubbish..i rather buy d s3 dan s3mini..or n9..or lumia920..or optimusG..dis fone z rubbish..sobs 4 samsung..andriod z good..buh meego z beta..buh hate meego cuz of nt good apps..M awt..peace
samsung only making their new cell phones for business class they haven't keep in mind the youngster, specially students class as they fixed them with very highly price that is far beyond from our expectations and htc also treated us the same way but thanks to sony they really care us and launches some new cells with low price and good hardware and software combinations