Still GS2 is a better option. God, this is why GS2 price never goes down.
Anonymous, 12 Oct 2012SGSII has better specs than this. Interesting strategy, Samsung.This isn't a high-end phone ok???
I cannot belive how many comments with the specs are crap, or how could this bare the name sIII. You dont realise that this is a very good piece of technology. I would buy it, because the 5mp camera is arhisuficient for me, and the processor is very good. Very superficial opinions these days.
When high end phones come out, fanboys praise it.
when it has low spec, fanboys find excuses and reason to praise it
I was thinking, its just the screen size was changed.... the series name also GT 8190, even seems like lower than galaxy S and Galaxy SII. it is more similar to GALAXY ACE 2 (GT 8160) and GALAXY W (GT 8150). if this phone goes to the MID end device, then it should be having a different name rather than SIII mini. It makes the "S", downgraded.
S4 pro + Adreno 320 could have done a wonder worrier to this phone.
Now, everything got rotten with that great expectation.
This might not be 'top spec', but it's not meant to be. It's meant to be a cheaper, smaller alternative to those people who don't want to shell out money for the actual SIII, which I have.
Cannot believe !
tagging the name of best selling "galaxy S III" on this cheap phone..... and starting to Cheat customers.
Samsung worse adventures in history with cheap mini S III,spoiling their best selling "grant" gsIII image and status.
Now, I have completely lost interest even in buying galaxy SIII.
will move to lumia 920 when released.
It may look a bit superior to s advance in specs with that 1 gb ram vs 768 mb on the s advance but on digging deeper it is not.infact it's inferior in some areas.
s advance for example has a 1.3 mp front cam vs 0.3 mp on the mini.plus mini also doesn't have an ambient light sensor.though it does has newer software but seeing all this it makes no sense for s3 mini to be priced above s advance.