Well it looks like S3 but the specs is much the same as Galaxy ace......Hmmmp
Anonymous, 11 Oct 2012It's like a SGSII mini, bad move for sammy, badbad comment from you, bad
Seriously this phone is just nonsense. Unless you're after the design but other than that you can buy a S3 with almost the same specs.
I'm suprised they didn't use high end specs like the S3 so this phone would compete with the iphone 5.
Missing opportunity..A phone with the same specs as S3 but with 4" screen and a bit cheaper would have been a great hit. But Samsung probably doesn't want to hurt the sell of the very profitable S3. So better look at the coming 2013 Sony phones...
doesn't make sense the galaxy s2 is better and cheaper and a 1500 mAh batter man the galaxy w should be better then for about 250$
I don't think that quad-core running Jelly-Bean would be such a good idea when most phones running Icecream sandwich are running best off a quad-core...
Very disappointed in the specs shown so far. The Galaxy S Advance is better than the SIII mini imho. For the first time, Samsung came up short :(
Anonymous, 11 Oct 2012It's like a SGSII mini, bad move for sammy, badUhm, don't you think that is EXACTLY what Samsung wants? DUH!