costs around $400 here in the UK.
so bang for the buck phone not to forget the S3 look and jellybean out of the box is the key selling point OF THIS PHONE.
although I dont know why samsung launched this,since there was an existing galaxy S advance at a slightly cheaper price with almost same specs present(currently on 2.3 but going to get direct JB update).
maybe they decided to sell the phone on S3 name or as a direct competition to xperia P which also has similar processor and 1gb ram
Oh God! again Novathor U8420! really sucks. why not Snapdragon S4 MSM8627 1ghz duel core with adreno 305 gpu? Samsung now making profit, their smartphone price too high. They now cheating customer.
People are loving to have samsung galaxy s111....so samsung is trying to reach to everyone..who wants basic phone as well.....and should be handy......its nice luanch from s
What the heck?
Whats the special in this phone? Except Dual core.
No Gorilla glass
No better front camera.
Just 5 MP main camera.
223 ppi pixel density
of course jelly bean out of box.
What samsung trying to sell this kind of phone.
SII will be better in the same price range may be little old one.
all the specs are quite good except the camera. this phone has a gpu Mali-400 ;)
OMG, it looks exactly like the Galaxy Trend S Duos S7562 I got just last month, lol!
Galaxy S III mini ha ha ha ha ha..........
Specifications CPU, GPU, Pixels videos, camera twice lower than gs2.
Very very bad moved by Samsung, can even cheating customers with the big name future gs4 !
Ha ha ha.......
Well it looks like S3 but the specs is much the same as Galaxy ace......Hmmmp
Anonymous, 11 Oct 2012It's like a SGSII mini, bad move for sammy, badbad comment from you, bad
Seriously this phone is just nonsense. Unless you're after the design but other than that you can buy a S3 with almost the same specs.
I'm suprised they didn't use high end specs like the S3 so this phone would compete with the iphone 5.
Missing opportunity..A phone with the same specs as S3 but with 4" screen and a bit cheaper would have been a great hit. But Samsung probably doesn't want to hurt the sell of the very profitable S3. So better look at the coming 2013 Sony phones...
doesn't make sense the galaxy s2 is better and cheaper and a 1500 mAh batter man the galaxy w should be better then for about 250$