Its specification is lower than g s 2 but still price is higher than g s 2. Why ?
Samsung should try harder, this not worthly of Galaxy III name, specs are even worst than S II.
seing this phone, as it is for now, if it stays this way unless the price is smaller than the one for s2 , you would rather get s2 since it's only a little bigger and it has better specs, better features and probably better software
This is basically just a Galaxy S Advance with a similar shell to the S3.
And I own the proper S3 and this is just an insult to its name.
Wow, it really seems like a cheap way to sell a lot of phones by attaching the "SGS3" to this model, when its just an ENTIRELY DIFFERENT model with different specs. Shameful no?
if these r going to be the specs at a price tag of $515 then s2 or s advance are much better......
When you say S3 you mean power like hd screen full hd videos, it' s more like a 150 $ crap
All Samsung phones have rubbish batteries. 1500 mah battery, wont last even 8 hours.
make Up Ur Mind GSM ICS or JB? (Android OS, v4.1 (Ice Cream Sandwich)