Awesome phone, but it can beat the X10? That's the question. Both have a formidable 1GHZ CPU, 4 inch WVGA screen(Samsung beats the X10), 8MP(X10), 5MP(Samsung).
Jack, 16 Mar 2010Give how Samsung supported the Galaxy 1, I would rather buy an HTC or give Motorola and Sony E... moregalaxy 5700 android 2.1 upgrade is on the way but galaxy 7500 hardware doesnt support android 2.1...thats why 7500 is not getting 2.1 upgrade...
Haha, 03 Feb 2010Missing Digital Compass, it's a must feature for smart phones...dis phone has digital compass...
it will be the next multimedia monster if it supports stereo speakers..but....
Anonymous, 01 Feb 2010BORING... It's just another Android with the same old 5mp camera with no features, same old bo... moredude dis phone offers hd video recording n playback...go through specs once again...
the only problem with Samsung they releases phone to early and they dont support their other phones now im talking and sorry Samsung but your like Nokia they produces phone earlier but Nokia support their phones not like Samsung they produces phone earlier but they dont support their phones like the Omnia 2...
Jack, 16 Mar 2010Give how Samsung supported the Galaxy 1, I would rather buy an HTC or give Motorola and Sony E... moreyep.. happened to my Innov8 also.
Moreover, samsung after sales services were terrible here in Kuala Lumpur
Give how Samsung supported the Galaxy 1, I would rather buy an HTC or give Motorola and Sony Ericsson the benefit of the doubt, that they update their phones at least for one year after the release. Samsung already showed that they don't support their smartphone-users.
#1 my 7500 has android 1.6
#2 my htc magic does not have a working 2.1
#3 my 5700 spica has full working 2.1 for a week - the milestone not.
so i'd go for Galaxy2, if it would be available in time.
Well, it seems like Samsung develops its phones to last 6 months only. So I would not go for this phone. Obvious example is older Galaxy i7500 which is around 6 months on market and stacked with 1.5 version of OS. Company never offered upgrade on 1.6, 2.0 or 2.1. We could say, "bad for business", because users feel betrayed since HTC company is working on upgrade for its Hero phone with similar specifications as Galaxy.
interested with android. don't care the hardware manufacturer. but currently it seems moto's android is more appealing than sam's.
if samsung do as teh specs say the phone work have a check the phone properly and not leave faults out then people wouldnt be so down on them that much
Owners of the Samsung Galaxy No 1 bought a phone touted to be great. What they got was a phone with:
- a poor battery -less than 24 hrs
- a glitchy interface
- non-working pc software
- a company not prepared to support its users
Galaxy 2 could be the best next thing but I still wouldn't touch it given the experience of Galaxy 1 owners.
i would not recommend it.
if samsung is not capable of upgrading galaxy 1 to android 2 then they dont think about support. what if it turns out, that galaxy 2 has some annoyances? custom mods again?
thats what i think while still having galaxy 1
it will look like nexus one because the interface is default for android 2.1.