few things i liked about the s3. (P.S: have to say somethin positive after the criticism i did!! ;-p ) it has nfc which is really becoming mainstream nowadays and almost all recent nokia fones have nfc in them . Also the face detection unlocking feature is good so overall rating of dis fone should be:
and design- 3 !!!
Lapax, 04 May 2012If you remove the "Samsung" it could surely pass for one of those chinese imitation ... moreIt's low-end for you maybe, but for me it looks cool. It NOT looks like a brick! :P It has round edges. I don't tell that it's the most coolest phone, but it looks pretty cool. It has awesome specs, you GET a lot of internal storage...
Guyz why do you only see the outer part of the phone!!! Please Samsung Galaxy S III, Htc One X, LG Optimus 4X are similar in specs. But Samsung Galaxy S III is more featured packed compared to other two phone. See the Samsung Galaxy S III official website !!! . And dont forget Samsung Galaxy S III processor is 2 times faster than Htc's or LG's phones. You all think Samsung Galaxy S III has old GPU !!But Samsung Galaxy S III updated and more powerful Mali 400 GPU. Check this link :
Now you can believe Samsung Galaxy S III is the best!!!! :) :P
Oh dear... Another boring desing from Samsung. And plastic again!!! No innovation except HW... Stick with my Nexus Prime...
I guess most of da disappointed r thoz wo dreamt of a "super fone with imaginary specifications n looks". Dey just hav to come bk to reality. G S2 ws poor luking comare to many others bt its screen n features made it famous. Dis one too will be da same. Da screen n features will overshadow da "look" which i do nt mind even. I will definately get it wen its out.
Lapax, 04 May 2012If you remove the "Samsung" it could surely pass for one of those chinese imitation ... moreNowadays, all high end phones are competitive and speedy with dual cores or quadcores, benchmarking hardly differs from one to another...thus what differentiate a high end phone from another is another thing...its software, build quality and materials used.
Thats what samsung did not understand..
An executive wont carry this phone it will feel too cheap..also women will not carry it cz its too big for them...and those 2 categories of buyers are large..
you ppl are damn funny. picture quality aint judging by the mp. if u want a god damn high mp , go buy sony arc s with 12mp.. lol ? look at nikon camera d700 with 12.1 mp , does this mean their quality is like sony arc s ? samsung didnt bet you guys to buy their product.. lol
about plastic , why complain ? you guys start complaining when the phone is heavy and now they made the phone light , you guys complain againt.. how stupid it is ? fyi plastic absorb shock better than metal , dont u guys study ? use your brain and common sense dude..
who wants such high specs in a phone when it's too big and poor design? it's dimensions are too large to be classed as a 'phone' IMO.
Deejay, 04 May 2012A Pathetic looking phone.. How can Samsung luanch a phone looking so ugly when everyone had hi... moreyeah u are right. We pay a heavy price and in return we excpect something especially from the best company in the world and we get this!!! M not complaining about the software coz its the best, its even better and smarter than the one on iphone and its an ideal smartfone but the looks are very cheap and dirty especially the curved ends!! I was so happy wen i brought my s2 but i was regretting later that i should've waited for s3. Now i am happy that i purchased the s2 and i think it was a good decision coz i can upgrade to ICS and it has the same features as that of s3 only the screen size would be smaller and the processor would be less. Samsung.......... U've let us down :-( not expected from such an awsome fone making company!! :-(
the phenomena is..the pocket huge amount of profit by heading the market..and thats an advantage of the side of media perception..tech and what not.
Anonymous, 23 Apr 2012still far behind the HTC ONE x, its price is also too expensive for a plastic gadgetUse your common sense. Plastic has the ability to absorb shocks easily than metal. Even if you drop the phone and the phone and the plastic cracks (which can be easily replaced), its internals will be protected, which is not the case with phones of metal casing.
Lapax, 04 May 2012If you remove the "Samsung" it could surely pass for one of those chinese imitation ... morethe majority of people had chosen the plastic of the galaxy s2 and i think the majority will choose the s3.
the only company that can compete with samsung in the next few months is apple.
no doubt from the bigining till today samsung has only given SII and note upto mark. other models to buy is the wastage of money and time.
poor than expectation,ram is less.camera is lesser than Nokia 808 PureView,N8,HTC Titan II(16mpx),SONY XPERIA S.....not look as htc one x.....
i have the sg2..i have always thought the build quality, while good for plastic build( exept for pathetic batt cover) ,is a let down..the iphne looks good,, nokia n9 is amazing to hold and look at..the inside of the galaxy series of fones is top notch, the outer casings are,,,,well there just plain old ugly....when im out with friends and the fone come out of the pockets, its the iphone that everybody looks at.....just my opinion....i was expecting the gs3 to have a look that would make me upgrade instantly..but its not doing it...dam
If you remove the "Samsung" it could surely pass for one of those chinese imitation phones. Such a high end device and a low end design. I think don't think Samsung listens to the internet chatter otherwise they would know that majority of people don't want plastic for high end devices.