its better to buy s3 than waiting for note 2. but can anyone give me a clear picture about quad core? does it save 20% battery or consumes more? does it really make pocket warm? is it really that bad?
2 Days to go,i am excited now as to whats going to happen and is killing time at work thinking about it.
Hope they have fitted a Shutter Button..
[deleted post]Morol or Priyo which ever name you are using today,
You dont specify why it sounds better..I have had both Samsung wave and Galaxy S and galaxy s2 and the S2 fails in one department due to it using a Yamaha DSP rsather than Wolfson DSP..I may have stated this in other posts but i know which part the SGS2 fails in heavily whereas the Wave nad S1 dont..
You just come on and say Sony Walkmen sounds better but WHY?..
I will publish my reason in what part the SGS2 falls down but interested to know why you think Sony is better..I am interested for a big reason and wanted your input to see if its the same letdown..
I have had the Sony CMD Z7 and J5 and numerous Sony Ericssons from T68 to p900 to w900i to k770i and so on to many to list,,some where not to good some where pretty damn excellent..
So if you have an answer why you know why the Sony sounds better say so..
All mobile manufacturer including samsung are thinking on processor,camera,etc. I suggest all manufacturer to add new innovation like wireless charging , optical zoom in camera with infrared night vision camera and new technology in their new mobile to become leader. They cant rule market only by giving quad core or eight core with same 1 gb ram which is useless in mobile. As i am using samsung s2 or people using any dual core mobile are not going to buy quad core mobile without any new innovation.
I don't think Galaxy S III would be suprisingly wow..
Htc One X even almost the same with s3 according to the processor..
Let's see if there is anything good like 3D Screen or something?
tbt, 29 Apr 2012I know what does quad means, and it's not about cores, it' s about speed, handling multitaskin... morewrong. Nokia is slowest phone in all brands. even slower than HTC. I had the N8, I know what i'm telling you
If the phone is not yet released....how the hell can people give a performance rating?
s, 24 Mar 2012Release date Q3 Samsung copying Apple again!Thats just good business
a lot of companies release products at the same time as other companies to create competition
I think GALAXY s3 is for kids and girls having delicate hands and Iphone is for mature boys having strong hands.Hahahahahaha.
Number of "cores" has everything to do with speed. A single core processor is attempting to run all handset functions; screen, apps, etc. off one processor. A dual core or quad core processor is drastically beneficial because it's splitting up the work load
4,6" screen is too big for a phone, i think 3,5"-4" is the best size
It is what we were waiting for...
It is what you were waiting for...
It is what my cat was waiting for...
It is what the whole world was waiting for...
It is how it is...
Welcoming to you the Samsung Galaxy S3 aka i9300...
It is what is delivered through the galaxy family....
If that picture is real then that bezel looks far too thin. A thin bezel means that it is far too easy to accidentally press the screen with the skin between your index finger and thumb (unless Samsung have invented some way to detect this)
Wuteva anybody says_this is not wat was xpected! Just about the same as SG2,actually worse with too much processor for little memory causing imbalance! Wat all the dual core biz anyway? No1 will eva notice while in use! Still prefer SG2 coz can b upgraded to ICS too. SG3 has even lowered the standard with 1.3MP front facing while SG2 has 2MP! SG3 anyway should have blown SG2 into oblivion but has just stuck on the same spot! So dissapointed after such wait!
tbt, 29 Apr 2012If all that is true, than it is disapointed. At least they should have put 12 MP camera, I'm ... moreHow could you compare single core wit quad core, look in any computer and you will see that multi core CPUs have lower frequency/core than the single core one. Also you cannot compare 1.4 * 4 = 5.6 GHz with Nokia's 1.8.