These specs are impossible. Why would Samsung make their top model with a 1.5-year-old Mali-400 GPU? That's ridiculous. Samsung never disappoints with its top models. We will find out the specs on May 3 once and for all.
This is a shame...Though i am a big fan of samsung and a proud owner of Galaxy S2 but look S3's specification... Just a size difference and CPU d/f ...other things are same as compare to GS2... even i was expecting 12-megapixal camera but it cames with just 8-Megapixal camera... it means Sony's Xpira S is batter than Galaxy S3 with 12-megapixal camera and its stunning design... ??? Anyhow now i,ll not sold my s2 ... im disappointed with s3 ...
AnonD-4617, 29 Apr 2012it's a quad core bro!So what, speed is as same as single core processors.
It's quad because android 4.0 is too heavy OS which requires those elements. (only my opinion)
Mobilemaster, 29 Apr 2012Quad Core is too slow for you? Nokia has ONLY Single Core phones, and this is Quad(4).I know what does quad means, and it's not about cores, it' s about speed, handling multitasking and making effect on battery.
Nokia has the record of 72 open apps (I repeat 680 MHz processor and 256 MB of RAM).
Oh yeah, I bet that it will have same problem as Ipad 3, heating, getting warm while downloading.
tbt, 29 Apr 2012If all that is true, than it is disapointed.
At least they should have put 12 MP camera, I'm ... moreThis phone should be fast, its processor is great, more power would mean waste of battery...
But still, 808 Pureview and N9 grab all my attention...
AnonD-52420, 28 Apr 2012Brynn. Not everybody is Einsteins, but we should not judge others nor should we BASH them u... moreWhy you posting under different names? One minute your Humour Engineer next its CS..Same IP address..
samsung galaxy always good i like ★★★★&#9733;
tbt, 29 Apr 2012If all that is true, than it is disapointed. At least they should have put 12 MP camera, I'm ... moreFools rush in to give comments. When was clock rate a big issue. The new quad core processor has 20% less power consumption as compared to the older exynoses. So please show your dissapointment somewhere else.
MP doesn't matter. It's a phone. The lens/chip is smaller than your fingrenail, more megapixels is not going to get give you a better picture. I doubt the real resolution is over 2MP.
naah...for me,in the years before,me don't even think wanna buy any samsung phones...even today...haha
tbt, 29 Apr 2012If all that is true, than it is disapointed. At least they should have put 12 MP camera, I'm ... moreQuad Core is too slow for you? Nokia has ONLY Single Core phones, and this is Quad(4).
if thats the specs im not buying it because Mali-400MP they should of went to Mali-600MP ser dual core is enough no need for Quad-core they should of but dual core 2.0GHZ and Mali-600MP ser with huge battery 2800mAh then it would beat all the phones too 2013
If all that is true, than it is disapointed.
At least they should have put 12 MP camera, I'm impresed only with screen resolution and a lil' bit of processor, speed is to slow (it should have be at least 1.8 MHz, because Nokia has single core with 1.4 MHz).
Processor, android 4.0 and screen will eat the battery ,only with browsing the web and listening to music at the same time, in half a day, regardless on 2050 mA.
Obviously android 4.0 needs very strong processor and battery to work normally.
Unlike the Nokia N8 which was released in 2010 with 680 MHz single core processor and Symbian 3^, and can be updated to Nokia Belle and work fluently as much stronger and better phones (plus it handle 12 MP camera).