this sucks......i expected something much better from samsung and armani after the previous one......
this phone is so frickin beautiful! that is if your a yuppie like me. hehe. bravo samsung
its a rip off from se w902 wiv the music buttons on the side !! i think it would look better wivout the armani branding tbh
I agree with most, if you're going for that elegant look, go for it all the way,
mixing those colours with that cool gray/black is like throwing paint on an aston martin.
people will laugh at you.
think they forgot their roots
the design is so mad lol..
only if the screen was bigger and the camera was better this would be a big seller
i really like it....nice...simple...
small....and good battery...wow..
i dont need camera or flash on my phone...
I'm not sure why the design is rated 7 on this phone because it looks great (although I personally think the Luna by Nokia is my favorite luxury phone)! Just because its more expensive that most of us can afford doesn't mean you can't wish. I'm pretty sure any of you would want to drive a Lamborghini someday same as I'd like to flaunt this phone. One downside is the cheap and awkward looking "Emporio Armani" (with eagle-like logo) slapped on the front and side. Otherwise, the flush keyboard and oled screen (not to mention 3.2 megapixel camera) are nice additives.
ok samsung great and beautiful but nokia tradition like 5320 special music player
I think this is stylist music phone.
If this phone has good audio quality(maybe DNSe or B&O Amplifier include) and better price, than I can say recommended to buy.
To earlier to judge this phone was bad.
looks cheap despite the logo...
so many other better phones out there why would anyone get this one?
Design is not innovative, cheap look just like lg kg195. shame samsung & georgio armani.
3.2 mp camera without flash is useless
The specs are fine. If the battery has a super long talk time, then this phone shall be a steal!! Hope the price won't break the bank though.