Samsung U900 Soul - user opinions and reviews

• tom
• PFH
• 14 Feb 2008

good looking phone with exciting features

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Tahir Hussain
• nTU
• 13 Feb 2008

Phone looks dashing

i need some help.

Can any body tell me how long is the talk time for this phone?

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Anonymous
• 07B
• 13 Feb 2008

tri band would prevent alot of buyers from getting this phone, especially since 850 is needed in US

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• stokarit_cavalli
• MWn
• 13 Feb 2008

I now have U600 black version but i tink i will change it to U900 it looks very good and it has al the features i need.
Now Samsung is in the havy weight category along side Nokia .
Sony-Ericcson will take 3 place and LG will be near and fight for the 3 place .

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• rakeb
• mnE
• 13 Feb 2008

phones 2008 more than 2007various , increase phone 5mp also all phones 2008 increase quota in the market special samsung

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• rakeb
• mnE
• 13 Feb 2008

phones 2008 more than 2007various , increase phone 5mp also all phones 2008 increase quota in the market special samsung

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Fayez
• ijp
• 13 Feb 2008

Nice job! best mobile phone by samsung ever.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• gooster
• q}h
• 13 Feb 2008

can anyone confirm the bandwidth? thanks for the threads but which one is correct? tri or quad?

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• sant
• LKm
• 13 Feb 2008

a contradiction on the bandwidth
http://www.mobileburn.com/news.jsp?Id=4110&source=MOSTREAD

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• sant
• LKm
• 12 Feb 2008

the first post from gsm arena is that itz quad band then now on spec itz tri band yet from samsung it has no offical specs as yet statin it band (quad/tri) which one is it? if itz tri then that's stupid as the last Ultra (i have the u600) quad is better.
anyone can confirm it bandwidth?

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Cyberpandaz
• TIE
• 12 Feb 2008

erm 1 more is the screen small or normal or big ??
look small too me le

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• cyberpandaz
• TIE
• 12 Feb 2008

First time comment here coz this phone Wow me !
Samsung lover here u love this Phone !! must have it -.- n what symbian ? wifi i dont care -.- dont use internet on phone de -.-
hope the music will be loud !
my budget for this phone hope less than sg$600 TT

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Anonymous
• mpb
• 12 Feb 2008

That Magic Pad looks so Cool. Think this phone will be King

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Anonymous
• PB4
• 12 Feb 2008

very gud samsung!!! u r competing with nokia with ur 16m color!!!

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• saveferris
• Pxv
• 12 Feb 2008

By the sounds of this they will be releasing other colors

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f9_N1Ty-Fwc&feature=related

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• dlraud
• RBV
• 12 Feb 2008

i can't wait to use this phone

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Anonymous
• wgj
• 12 Feb 2008

I think this phone's design is more aimed at the male market when compared to the u600 and the u700.

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Kal
• Pxq
• 11 Feb 2008

the major development on this model is that now you can customize skins which was missing in samsung before. Cheers!

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Anonymous
• 2An
• 11 Feb 2008

don't be confused guys, cause LG also has a model name "U900"

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report

• Anonymous
• U2U
• 11 Feb 2008

great phone, well thought out. Major disappointment is lack of a video calling camera. Wifi is pointless on phones without larger screens, hence the release of touchscreens. Great specs, just lacks a good flash and video calling

• Rating0 |
• Reply
• Report