Samsung Vibrant - user opinions and reviews
- Oko
- RbX
This phonespecs areh wrong. Talk time islless than half of specs. Same with browsing its about an hr max. Really crappy compared to an iphone.
- Anonymous
- 4VY
Anonymous, 17 Sep 2010"The Samsung Vibrant does not have a front facing camera" It doesIt doesn't, then you say it does ? You make no sense.
- Frank
- u{G
Is this much like with I9000 Galaxy S? I still don't understand why Samsung create model number so difficult to understand.
- Anonymous
- 4@B
The Samsung Vibrant does not have a front-facing camera. The Samsung Epic (Galaxy S phone for Sprint) has the front facing camera. In my opinion, the Vibrant doesn't need one. I think it beats out the other phones of the series.
- Paul
- Q82
I used a full charged (100%) phone (it took 3 hours to get it there from a 4% juice) only for calls to check the actual's claimed by Samsung. I turned off all internet activity, background data, 3G network, animations, min screen brightness and didn't even text. I received only 2 calls and called out rest of the times. The total "standby plus calling time" for which the phone lasted was 43 hours which had 10 hours 58 mins(91% of battery use out of the 96% i had consumed before started charging it again) of total voice calls and 1 hour 54 mins (7% of the battery use out of the 96%) of display use which i guess again includes the time display is ON when you dial the numbers, hang up etc during the calls..
KUDOS!!
that's cool i guess..
but my NOKIA E72 does better (sorry to compare to way diff phones, but i am a HUGE fan of the way NOKIA phones' batteries last!!!). A full charge gets me through to about 38 hours with 11 hours of talking, texting, alarms, incoming calls ringing, email checking 10 times a day, occasional Google search.
The only diff here i believe is the high powered samsung processor (1Ghz over Nokia's 600 Mhz) and the HUGE disply of the SGS..
- mike
- QRF
Anonymous, 15 Sep 2010Can you take a picture of the screen like you can with an iphoneno u cant
- Phoneboy
- Lbj
Sorry for my previous comment. I viewed pictures. Actually they show pics of Galaxy S. The Samsung Vibrant does not have a front facing camera
- hero
- 4{7
Anonymous, 14 Sep 2010Confirmed:vibrant has NO front facing camera, only the i9000 global version does, update please.Secondary front camera Yes, VGA
- Anonymous
- THw
Confirmed:vibrant has NO front facing camera, only the i9000 global version does, update please.
- jherrera
- B$x
Igo, 09 Sep 2010Will this work on AT&T if i buy it unlocked?Yes it will work, I have one unlocked using a ATT card and it says that it is using 3g on att.
- phoneboy
- Lbh
wishing, 10 Sep 2010samsung vibrant has no front cameraIt has a secondary (front) camera as mentioned in GSMarena phone specs. You can even view pics and watch videos related to this phone.
- Anonymous
- q9y
Texas Jeff, 13 Sep 2010No need to get one unlocked. AT&T has their own version of the same (Samsung Galaxy S) ph... moreSaw both at Costco, compare side by side, the captivate is so much bulkier, do not listen to him/her. Get the vibrant, is slimmer and look better than the captivator..
- Texas Jeff
- kQm
Igo, 09 Sep 2010Will this work on AT&T if i buy it unlocked?No need to get one unlocked. AT&T has their own version of the same (Samsung Galaxy S) phone. Theirs is called the Captivate.
Tip us
883k
147k NEW!
687k
RSS
Log in I forgot my password Sign up