comment@moaning so se will improve its product.
we wanna see se is on top of other brand.
we all love se, dont we?
is the camera good!!!! is the sound quality equal to that of walkman phones!!!........ some1 please tell
can i shoot an picture without smileshutter. means if the person is not smilling then wil the camera work. or if i want to take a picture of some building then wil it be posible as this camera has smileshuter and building dont smile.
Your all missing the point here. Its a budget camera phone and for what it offers for little money its great. You expect too much from a tiny lens im tiny phone. Its only 3 mega pixels. Mostly for fun snaps ribs taken outside look clear sharp on screen. Tweak your settings experiment. Why oh why do you all keep moaning if you dont like it dont buy it. Sony Ericsson done well to put this many features in cheap phone.
se k850 is better.
but its software seem to have so much problem.
se c510 camera is poor.
but its software is more stable.
so much prob frm SE.
SE design >>>>>>> Nokia.
Nokia software >>>>> Se.
low-mid end phone only.
se should put more effort on this phone.
Cyber-Shot underdog, 06 May 2009A cyber-shot camera phone is made for fusing a camera and a phone.So it should be capable of m... moreIts also on top of that its gotta fit all the phone stuff inside as well as camera.
A cyber-shot camera phone is made for fusing a camera and a phone.So it should be capable of making pictures right?? I know the c510 has a slimmer body.But when you have another gadget,like another Digicam or an mp3 player.Would'nt that make your bag Chunky and bulky?? Ok let's say another example,is that you left your camera at home all you got is your c510 but your in a night club,how do you make good indoor pictures with that?? What Im just saying here is that the c510 is meant to be a digital camera not just a phone.Right??
Well even though Xenon is build with a thicker body,it can be also be put in a slimmer body,but acceptable,even the Sony Digital Camera T-series are equipped with Xenon even though in a slim body.I know it's a phone not a camera,but in today's technology it is now possible,even the k810's thickness is still acceptable.A Cyber-Shot camera phone should bring good camera qualities even at night not to ruin it.And hey k810i did prove it by beating the waistline of the k800i so why not try it again??
cant expect much wif camera phone.
digital camera > > > camera phone.
Cyber-Shot under dog, 05 May 2009Well even the now aging k800i cyber-shot can beat the crap out of this in terms of picture qua... morebuy digital camera instead.
i was a about to buy k850.
despite of its size, i brought c510.
phone wif camera is mean for catch for fun.
if u want a better picture, buy digital camera.
enjoying my c510.
fariz, 22 Apr 2009after doing some research, i found out that c510 uses lense with smaller aperture (f/3.2) comp... moreGood one fariz.
A sensible explanation to the problem for "poor" camera performance of C510.
Don't overlook the 'budget shooter' side - after all, the phone is advertised as such: The pictures from the c510 are real poor, grainy and usually washed out, with huge color balance issues. Only best exposure over contrasted background (and no direct sunlight) and a very still subject will get you something worth as low as a Tweet or a Facebook post; autofocus takes ages, instant, action shots are impossible - you need to focus in advance, like on digital cameras from 10 years ago. Goodies like Smile Recognition takes ages too to decide wether your friend is actually smiling or facing trouble with yesterday's curry - that's even more likely if you have to ask them to keep on smiling forever!
Night/dark shots are reported to be less than good, and I can confirm they just turn out a wash of short-range white flash or a full dark blurr of black pixels.
The 3x zoom is actually a divider on the cmos, so if you shoot at 3.2Mp, you do not have a zoom: you need to lower your resolution, and then the pictures become really, really un-usable. And since the phone's screen is quite good, you'll notice it quite immediately.
With a phone that barely makes a decent picture at only the highest resolution, the bundled 'correcting' softwares are pretty useless, and more so that there isn't a resizing feature to allow you to spare your friends checking on a 600ko grainy pic that could weight 50 perfectly well (if not 5) - dataplan-wise, savetheplanet-wise, webspeed-wise, this is a shame.
Everything 3G/Connectivity is real great, design is on the flashy side of Girly Cool in white/red; interface can be less than intuitive though with 'applications' residing in the, guess what? ...Organiser folder! The Tilt sensor works not with every app, or just does not depending on where you are looking at your pictures from.
Facebook is reportedly included, but that depends on country/operator, so check it out before buying because it is not a simple Java download, this is something straight from the factory - you have it or you don't. And of course I don't. The official Sony-Ericsson .cz website reports this app to be full of bugs anyway; I hacked mine into it and you can't upload a picture, only post/follow text feeds.
All-in-all, a huge deception that was intended to be the latest in social blogging tool as a present for my very connected daughter A cool shooter to share her teenager life on Facebook. We got nothing of that, and boy, she worked hard at school to deserve it!
i expected better. but i guess the camera performance of a phone all boils down to the camera sensor/module used.
Cyber-Shot under dog, 05 May 2009Well even the now aging k800i cyber-shot can beat the crap out of this in terms of picture qua... moreAny phone that has Xenon in has to be quite big they cant be as slim as this phone cos of capacitors that power a flash.
Its a good phone.
Before i bought this phone, i used k750i, so i was thinking the cam features. specially the flash would be same, but then, its later i realized it was not so.
That meant I had to forget how i used the k750i and start afresh. The flash is good for close night time pics.
As for night time, all cameras, need proper light, if there is insufficient light, the pic is bound to be bad. I have no complaints about the phone.
A person has to use the phone for 1 whole day, read the manual properly and most importantly, forget abt all the phones used in order to enjoy this phone
Well even the now aging k800i cyber-shot can beat the crap out of this in terms of picture quality.No Xenon Flash?? What's a Cyber-shot without a Xenon,even though it's only a ****ing camera phone,they should try inserting a xenon one,rather than some little cruddy flash led,Sony Ericsson should must learn that all Cyber-shot phones must be equipped with Xenon,just like Walkman phones equipped with their Good for music Headphones, a 3.5mm adapter,even some of the latest low range walkmans are now equipped with shaker and the SensMe function (Just like sony's mp3 line up).As for Sony Ericsson Cyber-shot,they should equipped it with a better flash,and hey who needs face detection or smile shutter, when a dark room ruins all the faces right? I have'nt even seen a Sony Cyber-Shot digital camera equipped with LED's.
Even though it's a phone it's still a cyber-shot and a cyber-shot should promise great imaging capabilities whether it's night or day just as what the k800i prove back at those days.
They should try putting low to mid range cyber-shot phones with Xenon,even though it isn't that high end.It should promise great imaging capabilities no matter what the condition is.LED flash isn't enough for a camera phone,do you guys agree?