the photos are good, i don't see any bad quality with the photos and one important thing, the phone is under development and the photos taken are probably from older prototype, so u can't really go by that, when you have the fully developed product and if u see bad quality then comment.
I have to agree with Steve, if you guys actually look at the preview photos of the C902 posted by GSMarena, you can see that the quality is really poor. For a 500 USD camera phone you'd expect better quality picture. Really, do a comparison between the C902 and the N82 pictures, you can see the quality difference.
I agree that the sensor sux. There is too much noise and the purple fringing is very noticeable. Plus I really hate the colour reproduction on the camera. It doesn't look natural to the eyes.
I was very excited when this phone was announced, it has a lot going for it, but the quality of the photo (the most important aspect) is the part that is disappointing me the most. What's the point of owning a camera phone when it is not performing well on a task that it is built upon?
"thats your opinion steve. so pls don't try to speak for everyon here.. is all base on taste and more defenetly ppl won't agree with you even if your a high tech geek. If you don't like it than dang built one yourself.. but stop bithcing bout it.."
Listen, people are saying how good they think it will be, I am telling people how good it ACTUALLY is. If you don't like what I have to say then it's too bad, but I have two of them on my desk right now and I am fully able to give an unbiased view of this handset.
People can choose to disagree with me if they so wish, but all I have to do is ask them if they have used one, their answer will of course be an emphatic "no" so their opinion is invalid.
The quality of the photos and camera sensor has nothing to do with taste. It's about the quality of the product, which in this case, isn't that good. It's better than mid-range phones, but that's not saying much.
To give you some kind of benchmark to judge the camera, the 3.2mp camera module in the Nokia 6500 slide takes vastly superior photos to the C902.
why dont SE use Carl Zeiss optics ???
Hmm well one reason is "exclusive contract" it could be that carl zeiss has an exclusive contract with nokia and other manufactures. Sony cameras uses carl zeiss, so I think is an exclusive contract for now.
thats your opinion steve. so pls don't try to speak for everyon here.. is all base on taste and more defenetly ppl won't agree with you even if your a high tech geek. If you don't like it than dang built one yourself.. but stop bithcing bout it..
"I just hope that this phone's camera is better than that of the K850's as because the K850 had
many problems with its both camera and software"
The C902 also has many, many problems. Will they be fixed in time with firmware updates? No, because the camera sensor isn't very good.
"is just like buying a car. you won't buy it till you test drive it right? right!..."
I AM test driving it for one of the UK's largest networks! It's crap.
Whilst the C702 is a lower spec, it's a better overall package as it's not pretending to be something it's not and most importantly it doesn't really disappoint like the C902 does.
when is this phone to be released?????
how long can it take to ship a few boxes arouind the world???
come on se>>>> hurry the * up!!!!
still no optical zoom
why dont SE use Carl Zeiss optics ??? Thats why nokia are defeating SE, just because of Carl Zeiss optics
the opinion of one guy wont settle how this phone rating is.. so Steve if thats your opinion than thats that. everyone can go back and fort saying this phone sucks this phone is awesome.. so for everyone waith till this phone hit the market get the real thing in your hands and make your opinion base on what you feel see. simple is that. till then don't listen to anyone cause no one makes their mind for everyone. cirterly not mine.. ill decide wether this phone is right for me. so you should do the same. is just like buying a car. you won't buy it till you test drive it right? right!...
It's Great
I just hope that this phone's camera is better than that of the K850's as because the K850 had
many problems with its both camera and software
This phone is one of my top 5 wanted cellphones. It's very stylish.
The SE C902 it's the good Cybershot phone.Because it has 5 megpixel and face detection for the get the better picture.
This is a sweet phone. It's thinner than the k550, has the touch keys and a 5mp camera. two things though... too small of screen, i mean, come on... and why no built in GPS? I'm torn between the w760 and this one due to the strong points and weak points of both. Too bad the cell phone company i work for gets everything last, i mean seriously, we are ABOUT to get the HTC Touch and the Nokia 5310.
The Walkman-version of the Sony Ericsson C902 is on the way. The codename of it is Patty.
Just checked the prices again and at the time of writing, the red variant will be £350 and the black version £20 cheaper.
@rob
It's going to be approx £350 SIM free in the UK. I expect the price to fall quite quickly when they realise it's not selling very well. It styling is horrendous so it's not going to sell based on looks and as I said yesterday, the camera is rubbish which is the main feature of this handset.
the picture quality is noisy (red specs at the background).. due to small lenses and high pixel. though its very compact and stylish but due to it, the features are compromised. its better to wait for the next model.plus the small screen and the touch screen pads ( which consumes an amount meant for the screem) , its quite not that convincing. . what i appreciate is that it's camera flash is better than xenon. ..
the features of k850 should be retained in this phone ( the screen and the accelerometer)...
hope i will be convinced next time
Tip us
2.0m 150k
RSS
EV
Merch
Log in I forgot my password Sign up