well that is a good example allan,another example is:
what if you see your crush or a celebrity that you adore and he/she lets you have a photo or a video taken with you.
for the sake of traditinality, and convenience of not bothering that special person, in taking "the moment". You would probably opt to just take a picture and get on with your own businesses
but what if that special person conversed with you, chat with little bit...even told you that you are good looking or he/she also has a crush on you
you wont convince your friends that this special person that's with you in the picture told you that you are also special to him/her
but if you opted to record the video and the video would speak for itself...its a rare moment captured in VGA and 30fps in all its glorious form
your friends would see it all and its the ultimate form of evidence...bar none
As was my example of a rock concert. Camcorders aren't allowed in but cell phones are.
and on a side note:
it's easier to edit a photo than edit the quality of a video
saying that recording videos in good quality isnt important isnt a fact...it is just an opinion and a denial at that...
face it people....the only way to make a revolutionary camera is to include how good it;s video capabilities are...thus xperia for sony erisson is rock solid....
hmm the analogy used by dani isnt really...valid
I mean how could picture taking be anymore important than taking videos?
an event...an affair or anything both the pictures and videos gives alot....I of somethng to remember by...
but heck it would really be better if you'd remember an event by its motion and sounds...
Allan, 27 Jun 2008I wouldn't buy it with qvga, does that mean that i also have a problem. No. I have vga reco... moreActually you do. Cause buying a mobile phone is more than just a video recording. It had became a problem that you couldn't think straight anymore.
I wouldn't buy it with qvga, does that mean that i also have a problem. No.
I have vga recording already. N95
bill, 26 Jun 2008Don't you have any brains, what nick is saying makes perfect sense. If you wouldn't buy a dig... moreIf the C905 can just record QVGA video, im fine with that. Im not going to make a big issue with feature that i will not going to use frequently anyways. If you can't live with that, then you're the one with the problem.
Think it s great!
And think that some people just spred some b**st...
And that Nokia s phones are a bulk of crap!
I think i've found the perfect complete phone. the nokia 1208 its awesome nothing will ever compare to the greatness of this beauty
Anonymous, 26 Jun 2008nick... again..'would you buy a real digi camera with qvga video? no you wouldnt.'... sorry if... moreDon't you have any brains, what nick is saying makes perfect sense.
If you wouldn't buy a digital camcorder with qvga, then why accept it in a phone.
nokia software/ user-interference sucks!! it's ugly and not stable.
SE's is easy, orginised,stable... similar to macs= SE=hi quality
and to the post earlier saying that nokia needs the smartphones to compete with s.e.s feature phone,
how on earth would nokia feel the need to do that when they were the first to release a do it all phone?
remember the 7650?it is a smartphone, released even sony ericsson became sony ericsson
what did S.E. release back in the day to compete?
a t610 which only had a CIF camera compared to 7650's VGA and 3 mb of memory compared to the t610's measle less than 1mb?
point is...nokia was the first and they released smartphones even before sony ericsson started realisng phones...if any company would feel the need to compete, it would be sony as they were just starting at that time...
ehat makes the n82 look like a toy to the x1 or the g900?
because it isnt touchscreen?
heck n82 with its dual core cpus and 128mb ram and 256mb rom and a video card destroys even the xperia and g900
how about the camera? n82 kicks its ass period
well of course this would destroy the series 40 phones wich are out right now compared to this which isnt even out yet... but it would be fair to compare the 6500 slide to the k810 for example in which each has their own advantages
nick, 25 Jun 2008if shayn has all the phones he has a right to compare.
the fact is, whenever nokia has riva... more"shayn has all the phones he has a right to compare.
the fact is, whenever nokia has rivaled a se phone, the nokia phone always has more features and beats them."
well i doubt about it. You forgot the FACT that you are comparing a smartphone with just a normal feature phone. The fact is nokia's feature phone cannot stand up to Sony ericsson's one. Sony ericsson's feature phone is that far ahead to the extend that Nokia must comes up with smarphone solution to deal with sony ericsson feature phone.
If you want to have a fair comparison, compare those N82 with SE offerings like X1 or G900, to which will only makes nokia's offering sounds like kid's toy.
compare this phone with offering like 6600 fold or those music phones thingy, which phones i don't even bother paying attention to. The winner is obvious, Sony ericsson all the way.
Shayn, 25 Jun 2008ok let me make this simple for u dumb ones out there before u say something research first. ... moreyou must be nuts to say that you experience 3D ringtone on your phone coz with the kind of power out put they have they can barely manage a sound stage let alone the 3D effect (hope you know what a sound stage is)so even with full blown home theaters you need to have an enclosed environment for the 3D to take effect ( hope you know what 3D sound is ) go and get your facts straight or visit B&O site the first to provide a 3d amp inside a phone i.e samsung beat 450 and that too works only with the earphones,hope this post has imparted some wisdom in you.